Listing the "Blender Foundation" as copyright holder implied the Blender
Foundation holds copyright to files which may include work from many
developers.
While keeping copyright on headers makes sense for isolated libraries,
Blender's own code may be refactored or moved between files in a way
that makes the per file copyright holders less meaningful.
Copyright references to the "Blender Foundation" have been replaced with
"Blender Authors", with the exception of `./extern/` since these this
contains libraries which are more isolated, any changed to license
headers there can be handled on a case-by-case basis.
Some directories in `./intern/` have also been excluded:
- `./intern/cycles/` it's own `AUTHORS` file is planned.
- `./intern/opensubdiv/`.
An "AUTHORS" file has been added, using the chromium projects authors
file as a template.
Design task: #110784
Ref !110783.
Although we had only 190 developers, the script
was accusing a total of 365 developers (with 188 inactive).
There were two problems here:
* The gitea API was only using the `limit` paramater when an explicit
page was passed.
* There was a bug with the get_next_page code, that would skip the last
page.
I now made the page always an explicit argument passed to fetch_single.
With this fix we now get: 190 developers with 98 inactive.
Note, at the moment it is using the last login as a criteria to
whether the person should be listed (comparing it to 2 years past).
However anyone who hasn't logged in in gitea yet shows as last login 1970.
To run this you need to install all the required python packages and
generate a token with scope "read:org" or "admin:org".
See:
https://projects.blender.org/infrastructure/blender-projects-platform/issues/55
