It uses an idea of accumulating all possible light reachable across the
light path (without taking shadow blocked into account) and accumulating
total shaded light across the path. Dividing second figure by first one
seems to be giving good estimate of the shadow.
In fact, to my knowledge, it's something really similar to what is
happening in the denoising branch, so we are aligned here which is good.
The workflow is following:
- Create an object which matches real-life object on which shadow is
to be catched.
- Create approximate similar material on that object.
This is needed to make indirect light properly affecting CG objects
in the scene.
- Mark object as Shadow Catcher in the Object properties.
Ideally, after doing that it will be possible to render the image and
simply alpha-over it on top of real footage.
Before, Cycles would first sync the shader exactly as shown in the UI, then determine and sync the used attributes and later optimize the shader.
Therefore, even completely unconnected nodes would cause unneccessary attributes to be synced.
The reason for this is to avoid frequent resyncs when editing shaders interactively, but it can still be avoided for noninteractive renders - which is what this commit does.
Reviewed by: sergey
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2285
Previously, the code would only update the status string if the main status changed.
However, the main status did not include the remaining time, and therefore it wasn't updated until the amount of rendered tiles (which is part of the main status) changed.
This commit therefore makes the BlenderSession remember the time of the last status update and forces a status update if the last one was more than a second ago.
Reviewers: sergey
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2465
This is to help debug and track memory usage for generic buffers. We
have similar for textures already since those require a name, but for
buffers the name is only for debugging proposes.
The idea is to make it simpler to remove noise from scenes when some prop uses
Sharp glossy closure and causes noise in certain cases. Previously Sharp Glossy
was not affected by Filter Glossy at all, which was quite confusing.
Here is a file which demonstrates the issue: {F417797}
After applying the patch all the noise from the scene is gone.
This change also solves fireflies reported in T50700.
Reviewers: brecht, lukasstockner97
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2416
Doesn't currently change anything, but would need for some future
work here.
It uses existing padding in kernel BVH structure, so there is
nothing changed memory-wise.
The issue here was mainly coming from minimal pixel width feature
which is quite commonly enabled in production shots.
This feature will use some probabilistic heuristic in the curve
intersection function to check whether we need to return intersection
or not. This probability is calculated for every intersection check.
Now, when we use multiple BVH nodes for curve primitives we increase
probability of that primitive to be considered a good intersection
for us. This is similar to increasing minimal width of curve.
What is worst here is that change in the intersection probability
fully depends on exact layout of BVH, meaning probability might
change differently depending on a view angle, the way how builder
binned the primitives and such. This makes it impossible to do
simple check like dividing probability by number of BVH steps.
Other solution might have been to split BVH into fully independent
trees, but that will increase memory usage of all the static
objects in the scenes, which is also not something desirable.
For now used most simple but robust approach: store BVH primitives
time and test it in curve intersection functions. This solves the
regression, but has two downsides:
- Uses more memory.
which isn't surprising, and ANY solution to this problem will
use more memory.
What we still have to do is to avoid this memory increase for
cases when we don't use BVH motion steps.
- Reduces number of maximum available textures on pre-kepler cards.
There is not much we can do here, hardware gets old but we need
to move forward on more modern hardware..
Quite simple fix for now which only deals with this case. Maybe we want to do
some "clipping" on image load time so regular textures wouldn't give NaN as
well.
This is a speed up option which is mainly useful for viewport. Gives nice speedup in
the barbershop scene of 2x when replacing GI with AO after 2nd bounce without loosing
too much details.
Reviewers: brecht
Subscribers: eyecandy, venomgfx
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2383
Similar to the previous commit, the statistics goes as:
BVH Steps Render time (sec) Memory usage (MB)
0 46 260
1 27 373
2 18 598
3 15 826
Scene used for the tests is the agent's body from one of the barber
shop scenes (no textures or anything, just a diffuse material).
Once again this is limited to regular (non-spatial split) BVH,
Support of spatial split to this feature will come later.
The idea is to create several smaller BVH nodes for each of the motion
curve primitives. This acts as a forced spatial split for the single
primitive.
This gives up render time speedup of motion blurred hair in the cost
of extra memory usage. The numbers goes as:
BVH Steps Render time (sec) Memory usage (MB)
0 258 191
1 123 278
2 69 453
3 43 627
Scene used for the tests is the agent's hair from one of the barber
shop scenes.
Currently it's only limited to scenes without spatial split enabled,
since the spatial split builder requires some changes to work properly
with motion steps coordinates.
Also fixed some issues with motion keys calculation:
- Clamp lower and upper limits of curves so we can safely call those
functions for the very first and very last curve segment.
- Fixed wrong indexing for the curve radius array.
- Fixed wrong motion attribute offset calculation.
Was a bit confusing to have transparent and translucent depth
exposed but no diffuse or glossy.
Reviewers: brecht
Subscribers: eyecandy
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2399
Please NEVER EVER use such a statement, it's only causing HUGE
issues. What is even worse: it's not always possible to immediately
see that the hell is coming from such a statement.
There is still some statements in the existing code, will leave
those for a later cleanup.
The Progress system in Cycles had two limitations so far:
- It just counted tiles, but ignored their size. For example, when rendering a 600x500 image with 512x512 tiles, the right 88x500 tile would count for 50% of the progress, although it only covers 15% of the image.
- Scene update time was incorrectly counted as rendering time - therefore, the remaining time started very long and gradually decreased.
This patch fixes both problems:
First of all, the Progress now has a function to ignore time spans, and that is used to ignore scene update time.
The larger change is the tile size: Instead of counting samples per tile, so that the final value is num_samples*num_tiles, the code now counts every sample for every pixel, so that the final value is num_samples*num_pixels.
Along with that, some unused variables were removed from the Progress and Session classes.
Reviewers: brecht, sergey, #cycles
Subscribers: brecht, candreacchio, sergey
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2214
This is a way to avoid possible memory corruption when render threads works
in parallel with UI thread.
Not guarantees complete safe, but makes things easier to check anyway.
Main intention is to give some quick way to control scene's memory
usage by clamping textures which are too big. This is really handy
on the early production stages when you first create really nice
looking hi-res textures and only when it all works and approved
start investing time on optimizing your scene.
This is a new option in Scene Simplify panel and it acts as
following: when texture size is bigger than the given value it'll
be scaled down by half for until it fits into given limit.
There are various possible improvements, such as:
- Use threaded scaling using our own task manager.
This is actually one of the main reasons why image resize is
manually-implemented instead of using OIIO's resize. Other
reason here is that API seems limited to construct 3D texture
description easily.
- Vectorization of uchar4/float4/half4 textures.
- Use something smarter than box filter.
Was playing with some other filters, but not sure they are
really better: they kind of causes more fuzzy edges.
Even with such a TODOs in the code the option is already quite
useful.
Reviewers: brecht
Reviewed By: brecht
Subscribers: jtheninja, Blendify, gregzaal, venomgfx
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2362
The code was templated already, so don't see big reason to have
3 versions of templated functions. It was giving some extra code
to maintain and in fact already had divergency for support of huge
image resolution (missing size_t cast in byte image loading).
There should be no changes visible by artists.
