The main issue of 'type-less' standard C allocations is that there is no check on
allocated type possible.
This is a serious source of annoyance (and crashes) when making some
low-level structs non-trivial, as tracking down all usages of these
structs in higher-level other structs and their allocation is... really
painful.
MEM_[cm]allocN<T> templates on the other hand do check that the
given type is trivial, at build time (static assert), which makes such issue...
trivial to catch.
NOTE: New code should strive to use MEM_new (i.e. allocation and
construction) as much as possible, even for trivial PoD types.
Pull Request: https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/pulls/136134
The general idea is to keep the 'old', C-style MEM_callocN signature, and slowly
replace most of its usages with the new, C++-style type-safer template version.
* `MEM_cnew<T>` allocation version is renamed to `MEM_callocN<T>`.
* `MEM_cnew_array<T>` allocation version is renamed to `MEM_calloc_arrayN<T>`.
* `MEM_cnew<T>` duplicate version is renamed to `MEM_dupallocN<T>`.
Similar templates type-safe version of `MEM_mallocN` will be added soon
as well.
Following discussions in !134452.
NOTE: For now static type checking in `MEM_callocN` and related are slightly
different for Windows MSVC. This compiler seems to consider structs using the
`DNA_DEFINE_CXX_METHODS` macro as non-trivial (likely because their default
copy constructors are deleted). So using checks on trivially
constructible/destructible instead on this compiler/system.
Pull Request: https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/pulls/134771
Similar to 5e46e3d28a.
This commit replaces the C-API version of `OpenSubdiv_Evaluator`
with direct calls to `EvalOutputAPI`. This removes a level of indirection,
theoretically reducing function call overhead, but also making the whole
system easier to understand and easier to modify. The downside is
further spread of `WITH_OPENSUBDIV` into the code, but I think that
can be improved in the future relatively easily once more of this sort
of change is finished.
Pull Request: https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/pulls/128278
Remove the indirection previously used for the topology refiner
to separate C and C++ code. Instead retrieve the base level in
calling code and call opensubdiv API functions directly. This
avoids copying arrays of mesh indices and should reduce
function call overhead since index retrieval can now be inlined.
It also lets us remove a lot of boilerplate shim code.
The downside is increased need for WITH_OPENSUBDIV defines
in various parts of blenkernel, but I think that is required to avoid
the previous indirection and have the kernel deal with OpenSubdiv
more directly.
Pull Request: https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/pulls/120825
Replace the C-class pattern function pointers with actual class methods.
Other than the obvious benefit of not requiring the "this" pointer to be
explicitly passed into every function call, this will make it much simpler
to remove the entire C-API class and replace it with its "impl" next.
For that next step we need to expose code to the implementation
of the topology refiner, so instead of defining stubs locally in the
opensubdiv intern class, we spread some WITH_OPENSUBDIV checks
in the blenkernel. As far as I know this is the only way to remove the
intermediate C-API and call opensubdiv functions directly from there.
Move most code to `blender::bke::subdiv`. That helps organization
and makes using C++ in subdiv code easier, which will be useful for
removing the unnecessary opensubdiv C-API wrapper.
Except for vertex groups and a few older color types, these
are generally replaced by newer generic attribute types.
Also remove some includes of DNA_mesh_types.h, since it's
included indirectly by BKE_mesh.hh currently.
Use the standard "elements_num" naming, and use the "corner" name rather
than the old "loop" name: `verts_num`, `edges_num`, and `corners_num`.
This matches the existing `faces_num` field which was already renamed.
Pull Request: https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/pulls/116350
All the relevant code is C++ now, so we don't need to complicate things
with the trip through C anymore. We will still need some wrappers, since
opensubdiv is an optional dependency though. The goal is to make it
simpler to remove the unnecessary/costly abstraction levels between
Blender mesh data and the opensubdiv code.
Listing the "Blender Foundation" as copyright holder implied the Blender
Foundation holds copyright to files which may include work from many
developers.
While keeping copyright on headers makes sense for isolated libraries,
Blender's own code may be refactored or moved between files in a way
that makes the per file copyright holders less meaningful.
Copyright references to the "Blender Foundation" have been replaced with
"Blender Authors", with the exception of `./extern/` since these this
contains libraries which are more isolated, any changed to license
headers there can be handled on a case-by-case basis.
Some directories in `./intern/` have also been excluded:
- `./intern/cycles/` it's own `AUTHORS` file is planned.
- `./intern/opensubdiv/`.
An "AUTHORS" file has been added, using the chromium projects authors
file as a template.
Design task: #110784
Ref !110783.
A lot of files were missing copyright field in the header and
the Blender Foundation contributed to them in a sense of bug
fixing and general maintenance.
This change makes it explicit that those files are at least
partially copyrighted by the Blender Foundation.
Note that this does not make it so the Blender Foundation is
the only holder of the copyright in those files, and developers
who do not have a signed contract with the foundation still
hold the copyright as well.
Another aspect of this change is using SPDX format for the
header. We already used it for the license specification,
and now we state it for the copyright as well, following the
FAQ:
https://reuse.software/faq/
The goal is to solve confusion of the "All rights reserved" for licensing
code under an open-source license.
The phrase "All rights reserved" comes from a historical convention that
required this phrase for the copyright protection to apply. This convention
is no longer relevant.
However, even though the phrase has no meaning in establishing the copyright
it has not lost meaning in terms of licensing.
This change makes it so code under the Blender Foundation copyright does
not use "all rights reserved". This is also how the GPL license itself
states how to apply it to the source code:
<one line to give the program's name and a brief idea of what it does.>
Copyright (C) <year> <name of author>
This program is free software ...
This change does not change copyright notice in cases when the copyright
is dual (BF and an author), or just an author of the code. It also does
mot change copyright which is inherited from NaN Holding BV as it needs
some further investigation about what is the proper way to handle it.
