Adds support for defining a number of tags as part of the rna-struct
definition, which its properties can set similar to property-flags.
BPY supports setting these tags when defining custom properties too.
* To define tags for a struct (which its properties can use then), define the tags in an `EnumPropertyItem` array, and assign them to the struct using `RNA_def_struct_property_tags(...)`.
* To set tags for an RNA-property in C, use the new `RNA_def_property_tags(...)`.
* To set tags for an RNA-property in Python, use the newly added tags parameter. E.g. `bpy.props.FloatProperty(name="Some Float", tags={'SOME_TAG', 'ANOTHER_TAG'})`.
ntree_shader_relink_displacement is creating a transient node that does not have a correct original to point to.
In this case we revert to constant uniform.
This way it is more clear what is needed to be passed and what is available
in the callback itself.
Thanks Dalai for review and tips about engine type!
This commit effectively reverts fix T45702 done in 067fe2719a.
Reasoning:
- Blender Internal is being replaced with Eevee, and will be removed entirely
rather soon.
- All render engines are planned to have own depsgraph, so such threading
conflicts should no longer be an issue.
- We don't want to spend time on porting workarounds for EOL things to a new
design. Less code -- faster the work :)
- If such notifications will end up needed for some other cases, we would
need to re-implement this a more proper depsgraph tagging/flushing and make
it to work with all copy-on-write datablocks and everything.
There might be much more logic involved there, also we might not know proper
evaluated CoW pointer there yet. So we leave this to dependency graph to
decide what exactly to do here.
No need to print status for basic & reliable operations,
build systems can output operations they run if needed,
or debug output changed in the source if developers are debugging.
Nice for ninja, so any printed text hints at a problem to fix.
User count was wrong for newly created files. We increase/decrease user count
when we link/delete objects from a SceneCollection.
So we don't want to leave user count of 1 after calling BKE_libblock_alloc in
BKE_object_add_only_object().
This is fully unreadable to have lots of boolean arguments scattered across the
whole argument list. What does `false, true, true` mean in terms of behavior?
Replace those with bitfield which has advantage of having more human readable
meaning.
Pretty straightforward this time, we already have a single struct
pointer containing all needed data (or nearly).
And we gain about 10-15% speed on tracking! :)
Two more 'not really useful' cases (OMP only shows some noticeable
speedup with above 1M elements, and since this is quick operation anyway
compared to even ather basic operators, gain is in the 1% area of total
processing time in best case).
So not worth parallelizing here, we'll gain much more on tackling heavy
operations. ;)
And BMesh is free from OMP now!
Performances tests on this one are quite surprising actually...
Parallelized loop itself is at least 10 times quicker with new BLI_task
code than it was with OMP. And subdividing e.g. a heavy mesh with 3
levels of multires (whole process) takes 8 seconds with new code, while
10 seconds with OMP one. And cherry on top, BLI_task code only uses
about 50% of CPU load, while OMP one was at nearly 100%!
In fact, I suspect OMP code was not properly declaring outside vars,
generating a lot of uneeded locks.
Also, raised the minimum level of subdiv to enable parallelization,
tests here showed that we only start to get significant gain with subdiv
levels of 4, below single threaded one is quicker.
Those three ones were actually giving no significant benefits, in fact
even slowing things down in one case compared to no parallelization at
all (in `BM_mesh_elem_table_ensure()`).
Point being, once more, parallelizing *very* small tasks (like index or
flag setting, etc.) is nearly never worth it.
Also note that we could not easlily use per-item parallel looping in
those three cases, since they are heavily relying on valid
loop-generated index (or are doing non-threadable things like allocation
from a mempool)...
