Note that this is turned off by default and must be enabled at build time with the CMake WITH_CYCLES_EMBREE flag.
Embree must be built as a static library with ray masking turned on, the `make deps` scripts have been updated accordingly.
There, Embree is off by default too and must be enabled with the WITH_EMBREE flag.
Using Embree allows for much faster rendering of deformation motion blur while reducing the memory footprint.
TODO: GPU implementation, deduplication of data, leveraging more of Embrees features (e.g. tessellation cache).
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D3682
This is an initial implementation of BVH8 optimization structure
and packated triangle intersection. The aim is to get faster ray
to scene intersection checks.
Scene BVH4 BVH8
barbershop_interior 10:24.94 10:10.74
bmw27 02:41.25 02:38.83
classroom 08:16.49 07:56.15
fishy_cat 04:24.56 04:17.29
koro 06:03.06 06:01.45
pavillon_barcelona 09:21.26 09:02.98
victor 23:39.65 22:53.71
As memory goes, peak usage raises by about 4.7% in a complex
scenes.
Note that BVH8 is disabled when using OSL, this is because OSL
kernel does not get per-microarchitecture optimizations and
hence always considers BVH3 is used.
Original BVH8 patch from Anton Gavrikov.
Batched triangles intersection from Victoria Zhislina.
Extra work and tests and fixes from Maxym Dmytrychenko.
This was we can introduce other types of BVH, for example, wider ones, without
causing too much mess around boolean flags.
Thoughs:
- Ideally device info should probably return bitflag of what BVH types it
supports.
It is possible to implement based on simple logic in device/ and mesh.cpp,
rest of the changes will stay the same.
- Not happy with workarounds in util_debug and duplicated enum in kernel.
Maybe enbum should be stores in kernel, but then it's kind of weird to include
kernel types from utils. Soudns some cyclkic dependency.
Reviewers: brecht, maxim_d33
Reviewed By: brecht
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D3011
Since all the shadow catchers are already assumed to be in the footage,
the shadows they cast on each other are already in the footage too. So
don't just let shadow catchers skip self, but all shadow catchers.
Another justification is that it should not matter if the shadow catcher
is modeled as one object or multiple separate objects, the resulting
render should be the same.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2763
The idea is to make include statements more explicit and obvious where the
file is coming from, additionally reducing chance of wrong header being
picked up.
For example, it was not obvious whether bvh.h was refferring to builder
or traversal, whenter node.h is a generic graph node or a shader node
and cases like that.
Surely this might look obvious for the active developers, but after some
time of not touching the code it becomes less obvious where file is coming
from.
This was briefly mentioned in T50824 and seems @brecht is fine with such
explicitness, but need to agree with all active developers before committing
this.
Please note that this patch is lacking changes related on GPU/OpenCL
support. This will be solved if/when we all agree this is a good idea to move
forward.
Reviewers: brecht, lukasstockner97, maiself, nirved, dingto, juicyfruit, swerner
Reviewed By: lukasstockner97, maiself, nirved, dingto
Subscribers: brecht
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2586
The issue here was mainly coming from minimal pixel width feature
which is quite commonly enabled in production shots.
This feature will use some probabilistic heuristic in the curve
intersection function to check whether we need to return intersection
or not. This probability is calculated for every intersection check.
Now, when we use multiple BVH nodes for curve primitives we increase
probability of that primitive to be considered a good intersection
for us. This is similar to increasing minimal width of curve.
What is worst here is that change in the intersection probability
fully depends on exact layout of BVH, meaning probability might
change differently depending on a view angle, the way how builder
binned the primitives and such. This makes it impossible to do
simple check like dividing probability by number of BVH steps.
Other solution might have been to split BVH into fully independent
trees, but that will increase memory usage of all the static
objects in the scenes, which is also not something desirable.
For now used most simple but robust approach: store BVH primitives
time and test it in curve intersection functions. This solves the
regression, but has two downsides:
- Uses more memory.
which isn't surprising, and ANY solution to this problem will
use more memory.
What we still have to do is to avoid this memory increase for
cases when we don't use BVH motion steps.
- Reduces number of maximum available textures on pre-kepler cards.
There is not much we can do here, hardware gets old but we need
to move forward on more modern hardware..
This way we can stop traversing BVH node early on.
Gives about 2-2.5x times render time improvement with 3 BVH steps.
Hopefully this gives no measurable performance loss for scenes with
single BVH step.
Traversal is currently only implemented for QBVH, meaning old CPUs
and GPU do not benefit from this change.
This reverts commit ecbfa31caa.
Original commit broke logic in nodes re-fitting. That area can
access non-existing children momentarely. Not sure what would
be best solution here, for now simply reverting the change/
The issue was caused by some false-positive empty non-AABB intersection.
Tried to tweak it a bit so it does not record intersection anymore.
Hopefully will work for all platforms. Tested here on iMac and Debian.
For proper indexing to work we need to use unaligned node with
identity transform instead of aligned nodes when doing refit.
To be backported to 2.78 release.
This is a special builder type which is allowed to orient nodes to
strands direction, hence minimizing their surface area in comparison
with axis-aligned nodes. Such nodes are much more efficient for hair
rendering.
Implementation of BVH builder is based on Embree, and generally idea
there is to calculate axis-aligned SAH and oriented SAH and if SAH
of oriented node is smaller than axis-aligned SAH we create unaligned
node.
We store both aligned and unaligned nodes in the same tree (which
seems to be different from what Embree is doing) so we don't have
any any extra calculations needed to set up hair ray for BVH
traversal, hence avoiding any possible negative effect of this new
BVH nodes type.
This new builder is currently not in use, still need to make BVH
traversal code aware of unaligned nodes.
This seems to be straightforward way to support heterogeneous nodes
in the same tree.
There is some penalty related on 4gig limit of the address space now,
but here's are the thing:
Traversal code was already using ints to store final offset, so
there can't be regressions really.
This is a required commit to make it possible to encode both aligned
and unaligned nodes in the same array. Also, in the future we can use
this to get rid of __leaf_nodes array (which is a bit tricky to do since
trickery in pack_instances().
There are several internal changes for this:
First idea is to make __tri_verts to behave similar to __tri_storage,
meaning, __tri_verts array now contains all vertices of all triangles
instead of just mesh vertices. This saves some lookup when reading
triangle coordinates in functions like triangle_normal().
In order to make it efficient needed to store global triangle offset
somewhere. So no __tri_vindex.w contains a global triangle index which
can be used to read triangle vertices.
Additionally, the order of vertices in that array is aligned with
primitives from BVH. This is needed to keep cache as much coherent as
possible for BVH traversal. This causes some extra tricks needed to
fill the array in and deal with True Displacement but those trickery
is fully required to prevent noticeable slowdown.
Next idea was to use this __tri_verts instead of __tri_storage in
intersection code. Unfortunately, this is quite tricky to do without
noticeable speed loss. Mainly this loss is caused by extra lookup
happening to access vertex coordinate.
Fortunately, tricks here and there (i,e, some types changes to avoid
casts which are not really coming for free) reduces those losses to
an acceptable level. So now they are within couple of percent only,
On a positive site we've achieved:
- Few percent of memory save with triangle-only scenes. Actual save
in this case is close to size of all vertices.
On a more fine-subdivided scenes this benefit might become more
obvious.
- Huge memory save of hairy scenes. For example, on koro.blend
there is about 20% memory save. Similar figure for bunny.blend.
This memory save was the main goal of this commit to move forward
with Hair BVH which required more memory per BVH node. So while
this sounds exciting, this memory optimization will become invisible
by upcoming Hair BVH work.
But again on a positive side, we can add an option to NOT use Hair
BVH and then we'll have same-ish render times as we've got currently
but will have this 20% memory benefit on hairy scenes.
It was initially unsupported because initial idea of checking visibility
of all children was slowing scenes down a lot. Now the idea has changed
and we only perform visibility check of current node. This avoids huge
slowdown (from tests here it seems to be withing 1-2%, but more tests
would never hurt) and gives nice speedup of ray traversal for complex
scenes which utilized ray visibility.
Here's timing of koro.blend:
Without visibility check With visibility check
Original file 4min 20sec 4min 23sec
Camera rays only 1min 43 sec 55sec
Unfortunately, this doesn't come for free and requires extra data in
BVH node, which increases memory usage of BVH nodes by 15%. This we
can solve with some future trickery of avoiding __tri_storage created
for curve segments.
This commit makes it so casting subsurface rays will totally ignore all
the BVH nodes and primitives which do not belong to a current object,
making it much simpler traversal code and reduces number of intersection
tests.
Reviewers: brecht, juicyfruit, dingto, lukasstockner97
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D1823
Notes:
- There is still some bvh cache code, but that is from the engines initial commit, we might clean this up further or keep it.
- Changes in util_cache.h/.c are kept, this might be re-used in the future.
Previous idea behind having vector during building and array for actual storage
was needed in order to minimize amount of re-allocations happening during the
build, but it lead to double memory overhead used by those arrays at the vector
to array conversion stage.
Issue with such approach was that for BVH without spatial split size of arrays
is known in advance and it never changes, which made vector to array conversion
totally redundant.
Also after testing with several rather complex from spatial split scenes (such
as trees) it seems even conservative approach of reallocation (when we perform
re-allocation when leaf does not fit into the memory) doesn't give measurable
difference in time.
This makes it so we can switch to array, which will avoid unneeded memory
re-allocations when spatial split is disabled without harming other cases.
it's a bit difficult to measure exact benefit of this change on our production
files here, but depending on the scene it might give quite reasonable memory
save.
This way we can get rid of inefficient memory usage caused by BVH boundbox
part being unused by leaf nodes but still being allocated for them. Doing
such split allows to save 6 of float4 values for QBVH per leaf node and 3
of float4 values for regular BVH per leaf node.
This translates into following memory save using 01.01.01.G rendered
without hair:
Device memory size Device memory peak Global memory peak
Before the patch: 4957 5051 7668
With the patch: 4467 4562 7332
The measurements are done against current master. Still need to run speed tests
and it's hard to predict if it's faster or not: on the one hand leaf nodes are
now much more coherent in cache, on the other hand they're not so much coherent
with regular nodes anymore.
Reviewers: brecht, juicyfruit
Subscribers: venomgfx, eyecandy
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D1236
This inconsistency drove me totally crazy, it's really confusing
when it's inconsistent especially when you work on both Cycles and
Blender sides.
Shouldn;t cause merge PITA, it's whitespace changes only, Git should
be able to merge it nicely.
The issue was caused by mismatch in how aligned triangles storage was
filled in during BVH construction and how it was used during rendering.
Basically, i was leaving uninitialized storage for triangles when
there was deformation motion blur detected for the mesh. Was likely
some sort of optimization, but in fact it's still possible that regular
triangles would be needed for rendering.
So now we're storing aligned storage for all triangle primitives and
only skipping motion triangles (the deformation motion blur flag from
mesh is now ignored).
Ideally we should get rid of those temporary vectors anyway, but
it's not so trivial because of the alignment. For untl then we'll
just have a bit worse solution. This part of code is not the root
of the issue of memory spikes for now anyway.
But since we're getting rid of temporary memory earlier actual spike
is a bit smaller as now. For example in franck_sheep file it's now
5489.69MB vs. previously 5599.90MB.
This way we save 3 bytes per BVH node while building BVH, which overall
gives 100Mb memory save when preparing Frank for render.
It's not really much comparing to overall memory usage (which is 11Gb
during scene preparation here) but still doesn't harm to have solved.
