by ensuring `KernelLight.lightgroup` is properly assigned in
`device_update_light()`. The value is later retrieved via
`lamp_lightgroup(kg, lamp)`.
`light_manager->device_update()` is called after
`background->device_update()`, so the background light group should
already been assigned when `device_update_lights()` is called.
Pull Request: https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/pulls/120714
Cycles samples environment map with a PDF proportional to the luminance.
This computation was assuming positive values, but generated texture
coordinates from world could have negative values, so the resulted CDF
was almost zero in the bug report scene.
Fixed by taking the absolute value when computing luminance in CDF.
Pull Request: https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/pulls/119896
By restricting the sample range along the ray to the valid segment.
Supports
**Mesh Light**
- [x] restrict the ray segment to the side with MIS
**Area Light**
- [x] when the spread is zero, find the intersection of the ray and the bounding box/cylinder of the rectangle/ellipse area light beam
- [x] when the spread is non-zero, find the intersection of the ray and the minimal enclosing cone of the area light beam
*note the result is also unbiased when we just consider the cone from the sampled point in volume segment. Far away from the light source it's less noisy than the current solution, but near the light source it's much noisier. We have to restrict the sample region on the area light to the part that lits the ray then, I haven't tried yet to see if it would be less noisy.*
**Point Light**
- [x] the complete ray segment should be valid.
**Spot Light**
- [x] intersect the ray with the spot light cone
- [x] support non-zero radius
Pull Request: https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/pulls/119438
For spherical spot light, when the shading point is close to the light
source, we switch to sampling the light spread instead of the visible
cone from the shading point. This has the benefit of less noise when the
spread is small.
However, the light spread sampling was not considering non-uniform
object scaling, where the actual spread might be different.
This patch switches sampling method only when the smallest enclosing
spread cone is smaller than the visible cone from the shading point.
An alternative method would be to compute the actual solid angle of the
scaled cone, and sample from the scaled cone. However, that involves
ray transformation and modifying the sampling pdf and angle. Since
non-uniform scaling is rather a niche case, it's probably not worth the
computation effort.
Pull Request: https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/pulls/119661
area light with zero spread was introduced in bf18032977. Such paths can
only be sampled with NEE, so MIS should not be used.
This fixes the discrepancy when Direct Light Sampling is set to MIS or NEE.
Pull Request: https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/pulls/118584
Add new "Soft Falloff" option on point and spot light that uses
the old light behavior from Blender versions before 4.0. Blend
files saved with those older versions will use the option.
This option is enabled by default on new lights.
Fix#114241
Co-authored-by: Weizhen Huang <weizhen@blender.org>
Co-authored-by: Clément Foucault <foucault.clem@gmail.com>
Pull Request: https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/pulls/117832
Using area-preserving mapping from cone to disk. Has somewhat distortion
near 90°.
The texture rotates with the transformation of the light object, can
have negative and non-uniform scaling.
Pull Request: https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/pulls/109842
* Use pi factor to convert between radiant flux and intensity
* Mark lights as normalized on export
* Add spot light export support
* Add treatAsPoint support for import and export
* Empirically match normalized distant light
* Fix wrong unnormalized point/sphere/disk light unit in Cycles
Overall it should be much closer now for all light types. Point and distant
light units are inconsistent between renderers, so not possible to match
everything there.
Ref #109404
Pull Request: https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/pulls/109795
This fixes the issue described in https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/issues/108957.
Instead of modeling distant lights like a disk light at infinity, it models them as cones. This way, the radiance is constant across the entire range of directions that it covers.
For smaller angles, the difference is very subtle, but for very large angles it becomes obvious (here's the file from #108957, the angle is 179°):
| Old | New |
| - | - |
|  |  |
One notable detail is the sampling method: Using `sample_uniform_cone` can increase noise, since the sampling method no longer preserves the stratification of the samples. This is visible in the "light tree multi distant" test scene.
Turns out we can do better, and after a bit of testing I found a way to adapt the concentric Shirley mapping to uniform cone sampling. I hope the comment explains the logic behind it reasonably well.
Here's the result, note that even the noise distribution is the same when using the new sampling:
| Method | Old | New, basic sampling | New, concentric sampling |
| - | - |- | - |
| Image |  |  |  |
| Render time (at higher spp)| 9.03sec | 8.79sec | 8.96sec |
I'm not sure if I got the `light->normalized` handling right, since I don't really know what the expectation from Hydra is here.
Co-authored-by: Weizhen Huang <weizhen@blender.org>
Pull Request: https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/pulls/108996
The spotlight is now treated as a sphere instead of a view-aligned disk.
The implementation remains almost identical to that of a point light,
except for the spotlight attenuation and spot blend. There is no
attenuation inside the sphere. Ref #108505
Other changes include:
## Sampling
Instead of sampling the disk area, the new implementation samples either
the cone of the visible portion on the sphere or the spread cone, based
on which cone has a smaller solid angle. This reduces noise when the
spotlight has a large radius and a small spread angle.
| Before | After |
| -- | -- |
||
## Texture
Spot light can now project texture using UV coordinates.
<video src="/attachments/6db989d2-7a3c-4b41-9340-f5690d48c4fb"
title="spot_light_texture.mp4" controls></video>
## Normalization
Previously, the normalization factor for the spotlight was \(\pi r^2\),
the area of a disk. This factor has been adjusted to \(4\pi r^2\) to
account for the surface area of a sphere. This change also affects point
light since they share the same kernel type.
## Versioning
Some pipeline uses the `Normal` socket of the Texture Coordinate node for
projection, because `ls->Ng` was set to the incoming direction at the
current shading point. Now that `ls->Ng` corresponds to the normal
direction of a point on the sphere (except when the radius is zero),
we replace these nodes with a combination of the Geometry shader node
and the Vector Transform node, which gives the same result as before.
Example file see https://archive.blender.org/developer/T93676
Pull Request: https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/pulls/109329
for energy preservation and better compatibility with other renderes. Ref: #108505
Point light now behaves the same as a spherical mesh light with the same overall energy (scaling from emission strength to power is \(4\pi^2R^2\)).
# Cycles
## Comparison
| Mesh Light | This patch | Previous behavior |
| -------- | -------- | -------- |
|  |  |  |
The behavior stays the same when `radius = 0`.
| This patch | Previous behavior |
| -------- | -------- |
|  |  |
No obvious performance change observed.
## Sampling
When shading point lies outside the sphere, sample the spanned solid angle uniformly.
When shading point lies inside the sphere, sample spherical direction uniformly when inside volume or the surface is transmissive, otherwise sample cosine-weighted upper hemisphere.
## Light Tree
When shading point lies outside the sphere, treat as a disk light spanning the same solid angle.
When shading point lies inside the sphere, it behaves like a background light, with estimated outgoing radiance
\[L_o=\int f_aL_i\cos\theta_i\mathrm{d}\omega_i=\int f_a\frac{E}{\pi r^2}\cos\theta_i\mathrm{d}\omega_i\approx f_a \frac{E}{r^2}\],
with \(f_a\) being the BSDF and \(E\) `measure.energy` in `light_tree.cpp`.
The importance calculation for `LIGHT_POINT` is
\[L_o=f_a E\cos\theta_i\frac{\cos\theta}{d^2}\].
Consider `min_importance = 0` because maximal incidence angle is \(\pi\), we could substitute \(d^2\) with \(\frac{r^2}{2}\) so the averaged outgoing radiance is \(f_a \frac{E}{r^2}\).
This only holds for non-transmissive surface, but should be fine to use in volume.
# EEVEE
When shading point lies outside the sphere, the sphere light is equivalent to a disk light spanning the same solid angle. The sine of the new half-angle is the tangent of the previous half-angle.
When shading point lies inside the sphere, integrating over the cosine-weighted hemisphere gives 1.0.
## Comparison with Cycles
The plane is diffuse, the blue sphere has specular component.
| Before | |After ||
|---|--|--|--|
|Cycles|EEVEE|Cycles|EEVEE|
|||||
Pull Request: https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/pulls/108506
This is a continuation of a fix from the last week in #108311.
The issue was not fully fixed due to a mistake in the regression
test file.
There are two major things which left to be fixed since the
previous patch:
1. Root nodes can not be shared, even if the local and distant
lights belong to the same light set. If the root node is shared
then the flattening will use the same node index for specialized
trees, which is not a desired behavior.
2. The node type needs to be preserved when a new node is
created for a subset of emitters. This is because tree sampling
in kernel will handle distant and local lights differently for
nodes where there are multiple emitters.
Pull Request: https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/pulls/108427
This will make further changes for light linking easier, where we want to
build multiple trees specialized for each light linking set.
It's also easier to understand than the stack used previously.
Pull Request: https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/pulls/107560
Due to floating point differences between importance sampling and
texture evaluation, disagreeing on whether or not a ray lies within
the sun disc.
* Use the same input values for geographical_to_direction() in
sky_radiance_nishita() and kernel_data.background.sun.
* The mathematical operations in pdf_uniform_cone() were adjusted to
match sky_radiance_nishita().
Pull Request: https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/pulls/106764
Make it a native Cycles light option instead of counter-acting the inverse
area calculation in Hydra.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D16838
* Group bounding box, bounding cone and energy to a struct called `LightTreePrimitivesMeasure`
* Add utility functions to add primitives to nodes or buckets
* Precompute the split bucket cost to improve efficiency (about 1.4x expected)
Pull Request: https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/pulls/105931
Push a task to `TaskPool` when more than `MIN_PRIMS_PER_THREAD` primitives are to be processed. The nodes are rearranged in a depth-first order when copied to the device.
Tested with the scene in #105550 on an Apple M1 Ultra (20 cores), about 11x speedup.
Pull Request: https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/pulls/105862
This reverts commit 19222627c6.
Something went wrong here, seems like this commit merged the main branch
into the release branch, which should never be done.
Cycles ignores the size of spot lights, therefore the illuminated area doesn't match the gizmo. This patch resolves this discrepancy.
| Before (Cycles) | After (Cycles) | Eevee
|{F14200605}|{F14200595}|{F14200600}|
This is done by scaling the ray direction by the size of the cone. The implementation of `spot_light_attenuation()` in `spot.h` matches `spot_attenuation()` in `lights_lib.glsl`.
**Test file**:
{F14200728}
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D17129
The background evaluation samples the sky discretely, so if the sun is
too small, it can be missed in the evaluation. To solve this, the sun is
ignored during the background evaluation and its contribution is
computed separately.
There has been an attempt to reorganize this part, however, it seems that didn't compile on HIP, and is reverted in
rBc2dc65dfa4ae60fa5d2c3b0cfe86f99dcb5bf16f. This is another attempt of refactoring. as I have no idea why some things don't work on HIP, it's
best to check whether this compiles on other platforms.
The main changes are creating a new struct named `MeshLight` that is shared between `KernelLightDistribution` and `KernelLightTreeEmitter`,
and a bit of renaming, so that light sampling with or without light tree could call the same function.
Also, I noticed a patch D16714 referring to HIP compilation error. Not sure if it's related, but browsing
https://builder.blender.org/admin/#/builders/30/builds/7826/steps/7/logs/stdio, it didn't work on gfx1102, not gfx9*.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D16722
* preempt_attr was copied from CUDA, but not used in HIP.
* Remove shadowed variable before conditional in EnvironmentTextureNode code.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D16741
**Problem**:
Area lights in Cycles have spread angle, in which case some part of the area light might be invisible to a shading point. The current implementation samples the whole area light, resulting some samples invisible and thus simply discarded. A technique is applied on rectangular light to sample a subset of the area light that is potentially visible (rB3f24cfb9582e1c826406301d37808df7ca6aa64c), however, ellipse (including disk) area lights remained untreated. The purpose of this patch is to apply a techniques to ellipse area light.
**Related Task**:
T87053
**Results**:
These are renderings before and after the patch:
|16spp|Disk light|Ellipse light|Square light (for reference, no changes)
|Before|{F13996789}|{F13996788}|{F13996822}
|After|{F13996759}|{F13996787}|{F13996852}
**Explanation**:
The visible region on an area light is found by drawing a cone from the shading point to the plane where the area light lies, with the aperture of the cone being the light spread.
{F13990078,height=200}
Ideally, we would like to draw samples only from the intersection of the area light and the projection of the cone onto the plane (forming a circle). However, the shape of the intersection is often irregular and thus hard to sample from directly.
{F13990104,height=200}
Instead, the current implementation draws samples from the bounding rectangle of the intersection. In this case, we still end up with some invalid samples outside of the circle, but already much less than sampling the original area light, and the bounding rectangle is easy to sample from.
{F13990125}
The above technique is only applied to rectangle area lights, ellipse area light still suffers from poor sampling. We could apply a similar technique to ellipse area lights, that is, find the
smallest regular shape (rectangle, circle, or ellipse) that covers the intersection (or maybe not the smallest but easy to compute).
For disk area light, we consider the relative position of both circles. Denoting `dist` as the distance between the centre of two circles, and `r1`, `r2` their radii. If `dist > r1 + r2`, the area light is completely invisible, we directly return `false`. If `dist < abs(r1 - r2)`, the smaller circle lies inside the larger one, and we sample whichever circle is smaller. Otherwise, the two circles intersect, we compute the bounding rectangle of the intersection, in which case `axis_u`, `len_u`, `axis_v`, `len_v` needs to be computed anew. Depending on the distance between the two circles, `len_v` is either the diameter of the smaller circle or the length of the common chord.
|{F13990211,height=195}|{F13990225,height=195}|{F13990274,height=195}|{F13990210,height=195}
|`dist > r1 + r2`|`dist < abs(r1 - r2)`|`dist^2 < abs(r1^2 - r2^2)`|`dist^2 > abs(r1^2 - r2^2)`
For ellipse area light, it's hard to find the smallest bounding shape of the intersection, therefore, we compute the bounding rectangle of the ellipse itself, then treat it as a rectangle light.
|{F13990386,height=195}|{F13990385,height=195}|{F13990387,height=195}
We also check the areas of the bounding rectangle of the intersection, the ellipse (disk) light, and the spread circle, then draw samples from the smallest shape of the three. For ellipse light, this also detects where one shape lies inside the other. I am not sure if we should add this measure to rectangle area light and sample from the spread circle when it has smaller area, as we seem to have a better sampling technique for rectangular (uniformly sample the solid angle). Maybe we could add [area-preserving parameterization for spherical
ellipse](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1805.09048.pdf) in the future.
**Limitation**:
At some point we switch from sampling the ellipse to sampling the rectangle, depending on the area of the both, and there seems to be a visible line (with |slope| =1) on the final rendering
which demonstrate at which point we switch between the two methods. We could see that the new sampling method clearly has lower variance near the boundaries, but close to that visible line,
the rectangle sampling method seems to have larger variance. I could not spot any bug in the implementation, and I am not sure if this happens because different sampling patterns for ellipse and rectangle are used.
|Before (256spp)|After (256spp)
|{F13996995}|{F13996998}
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D16694
