This adds the ability to switch between different application-configurations
without interfering with Blender's normal operation.
This commit doesn't include any templates,
so its mostly to allow collaboration for the Blender 101 project
and other custom configurations.
Application templates can be installed & selected from the file menu.
Other details:
- The `bl_app_template_utils` module handles template activation
(similar to `addon_utils`).
- The `bl_app_override` module is a general module
to assist scripts overriding parts of Blender in reversible way.
See docs:
https://docs.blender.org/manual/en/dev/advanced/app_templates.html
See patch: D2565
Ideally we need to find a way to remove such a static limit here, but it's not so
trivial to implement for texture nodes. Requires some bigger system redesign there.
Just raising limit for now, which is fine for modern systems.
This removes the goal springs, in favor of simply calculating the goal forces on the vertices directly. The vertices already store all the necessary data for the goal forces, thus the springs were redundant, and just defined both ends as being the same vertex.
The main advantage of removing the goal springs, is an increase in flexibility, allowing us to much more nicely do some neat dynamic stuff with the goals/pins, such as animated vertex weights. But this also has the advantage of simpler code, and a slightly reduced memory footprint.
This also removes the `f`, `dfdx` and `dfdv` fields from the `ClothSpring` struct, as that data is only used by the solver, and is re-computed on each step, and thus does not need to be stored throughout the simulation.
Reviewers: sergey
Reviewed By: sergey
Tags: #physics
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2514
Internal change needed for template support.
Loading the user preferences first so it's possible
for preferences to control startup behavior.
In general it's useful to load preferences before data-files,
so we know security settings for eg.
The thing i'm really starting to hate is the requirement to specify both
operation code and node type. Seems to be duplicated enums without real
need for that.
Was using some threaded queue on top of task pool, tssk...
Now using properly task pool directly to crunch chunks of smooth fans.
No noticable changes in speed.
Tried to completely get rid of the 'no threading with few loops' code,
but even just creating/freeing the task pool, without actually pushing
any task, is enough to make code 50% slower in worst case scenario (i.e.
few thousands of simple cube objects).
The root of the issue was in custom normal code, so far it assumed that
we could only have one cyclic smooth fan around each vertex, which is...
blatantly wrong (again, the two cones sharing same vertex tip e.g.).
This required a rather deep change in how smooth fans/clnor spaces are processed,
took me some time to find a 'good' solution.
Note that new code is slightly slower than previous one (maybe about 5%),
not much to be done here, am afraid.
Tested against all older report files I could find, seems OK.
