Regression caused by the introduction of partial resync in February 2022
(rB1695d38989fd482d3c). Code was missing adding some existing overrides
to the mapping in some specific cases, causing resync to create 'new'
ones instead of re-using existing ones.
This commit also adds a basic resync testcase that illustrates this
issue.
Use a shorter/simpler license convention, stops the header taking so
much space.
Follow the SPDX license specification: https://spdx.org/licenses
- C/C++/objc/objc++
- Python
- Shell Scripts
- CMake, GNUmakefile
While most of the source tree has been included
- `./extern/` was left out.
- `./intern/cycles` & `./intern/atomic` are also excluded because they
use different header conventions.
doc/license/SPDX-license-identifiers.txt has been added to list SPDX all
used identifiers.
See P2788 for the script that automated these edits.
Reviewed By: brecht, mont29, sergey
Ref D14069
Rename new API function introduced in recent rB3b0fab6dfaa0 to match our
convention to put the action (verb) at the end of names:
`operations_update`.
Sorry for not catching that during review.
The update_operations function will update the override structure of the
local object. When working with overrides the override structure is only
updated when the work-file is stored. When using scripts you might want
to enforce the update of override properties and operations.
This function removes a hack on the test cases.
Reviewed By: mont29
Maniphest Tasks: T86656
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D10848
This is functionality that isn't accessible via the user interface. The
API allows the creation and modification of an override template that
holds rules that needs to be checked when overriding the asset.
The API is setup that it cannot be changed after creation. Later on when
the system is more mature we will allow changing overrides operations.
NOTE: This is an experimental feature and should not be used in productions.
Reviewed By: mont29, sebbas
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D10792
Added a first test case for review. This will be the base for future test cases.
The current API is sufficient for what is expected for such a low level API.
One concern is that you need to trigger a save in order to update the library overrides
structure. Not expected from TD/Dev point of view.
Test cases are very important when implementing restrictive mode as it is a second evaluation mode that
has impact on the (current) permissive mode.
Reviewed By: Sebastián Barschkis, Bastien Montagne
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D10747
