There are two issues revealed in the bug report:
- the GPU subdivision does not support meshes with only loose geometry
- the loose geometry is not subdivided
For the first case, checks are added to ensure we still fill the
buffers with loose geometry even if no polygons are present.
For the second case, this adds
`BKE_subdiv_mesh_interpolate_position_on_edge` which encapsulates the
loose vertex interpolation mechanism previously found in
`subdiv_mesh_vertex_of_loose_edge`.
The subdivided loose geometry is stored in a new specific data structure
`DRWSubdivLooseGeom` so as to not pollute `MeshExtractLooseGeom`. These
structures store the corresponding coarse element data, which will be
used for filling GPU buffers appropriately.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D14171
The issue was uncovered by the 0f89bcdbeb, but the root cause goes
into a much earlier design violation happened in the code: the modifier
evaluation function is modifying input mesh, which is not something
what is ever expected.
Bring code closer to the older state where such modification is only
done for the object in edit mode.
---
From own tests works seems to work fine, but extra eyes and testing
is needed.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D14191
When dimension of images aren't a multifold of 256 parts of the gpu
textures are not updated. This patch will calculate the correct part of
the image that needs to be reuploaded.
Internally the update tiles are 256x256. Due to some miscalculations
tiles were not generated correctly if the dimension of the image wasn't
a multifold of 256.
New code from the vertex normal refactor cfa53e0fbe combined with older code
from 592759e3d6 that disabled instancing for custom normals and autosmooth
meant that instancing was always disabled.
However we do not need to disable instancing for custom normals and autosmooth
at all, this can be shared between instances just fine.
These features are complicated to support on GPU and hardly compatible
with subdivision in the first place. In the future, with T68891 and
T68893, subdivision and custom smooth shading will be separate workflows.
For now, and to better prepare for this future (although long term
plan), we should discourage workflows mixing subdivision and custom
smooth normals, and as such, this disables GPU subdivision when
autosmoothing or custom split normals are used.
This also adds a message in the modifier's UI to indicate that GPU
subdivision will be disabled if autosmooth or custom split normals are
used on the mesh.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D14194
The scale-to-fit option did nothing for single words when
the text box had a height. This happened because it was expected that
text would be wrapped however single words never wrap.
Now the same behavior for zero-height text boxes is used when text
can't be wrapped onto multiple lines.
Currently, when normals are calculated for a const mesh, a custom data
layer might be added if it doesn't already exist. Adding a custom data
layer to a mesh is not thread-safe, so this can be a problem in some
situations.
This commit moves derived mesh normals for polygons and
vertices out of `CustomData` to `Mesh_Runtime`. Most of the
hard work for this was already done by rBcfa53e0fbeed7178.
Some changes to logic elsewhere are necessary/helpful:
- No need to call both `BKE_mesh_runtime_clear_cache` and
`BKE_mesh_normals_tag_dirty`, since the former also does the latter.
- Cleanup/simplify mesh conversion and copying since normals are
handled with other runtime data.
Storing these normals like other runtime data clarifies their status
as derived data, meaning custom data moves more towards storing
original/editable data. This means normals won't automatically benefit
from the planned copy-on-write refactor (T95845), so it will have to be
added manually like for the other runtime data.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D14154
There was accidentally some displacement related code running even when not
using displacement.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D14169
- No need for `normal_tx` array if we normalize the planes in `plane_tx`.
- No need to calculate the distance squared to a plane (with `dist_signed_squared_to_plane_v3`) if the plane is normalized. `plane_point_side_v3` gets the real distance, accurately, efficiently and also signed.
So normalize the planes of the member `CameraViewFrameData::plane_tx`.
The node animation versioning code passes `nullptr` to the `oldName` and
`newName` parameters, but those weren't `NULL`-safe. I added an extra
check for this.
No functional changes, just a crash fix.
This removes manual handling of normals that was hard-coded
to false in the one place the function was called. This change
will help to make a fix to T95839 simpler.
It's better not to expose the details of where the dirty flags are
stored to every place that wants to know if the normals are dirty.
Some of these places are relics from before vertex normals were
computed lazily anyway, so this is more of an incrememtal cleanup.
This will make part of the fix for T95839 simpler.
The "Fill Caps" option on the Curve to Mesh node introduced in
rBbc2f4dd8b408ee makes it possible to fill the open ends of the sweep
to create a manifold mesh.
This patch fixes an edge case, where caps were created even when the
rail curve (the curve used in the "Curve" input socket) was cyclic
making the resulting mesh non-manifold.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D14124
In ffmpeg 5.0, several variables were made const to try to prevent bad API usage.
Removed some dead code that wasn't used anymore as well.
Reviewed By: Richard Antalik
Differential Revision: http://developer.blender.org/D14063
StringGrid has been deprecated in openvdb 9.0.0 and will be removed soon
Reviewed By: Brecht
Differential Revision: http://developer.blender.org/D14133
Due to recent changes there have been reports of incorrect loading of
GPU textures. This fix reverts a part of {D13238} that might be the
source of the issue.
Although rB56407432a6a did fix missing subdivision in some cases, in
other cases it did not return the mesh wrapper (like when using
autosmooth, which requires a copy of the mesh), so the non-subdivided
mesh was still returned.
The root issue was caused by a mistake in modifier copy data which was
wrongly re-generating source modifier data identifier.
The c8cca88851 simply exposed a bug in code which always was there
since the modifiers session UUID was introduced.
Shows an importance of const qualifier :)
Since now we delegate the evaluation of the last subsurf modifier in the stack
to the draw code, Cycles does not get a subdivided mesh anymore. This is because
the subdivision wrapper for generating a CPU side subdivision is never created
as it is only ever created via `BKE_object_get_evaluated_mesh` which Cycles does
not call (rather, it accesses the Mesh either via `object.data()`, or via
`object.to_mesh()`).
This ensures that a subdivision wrapper is created when accessing the object data
or converting an Object to a Mesh via the RNA/Python API.
Reviewed by: brecht
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D14048
This node is a bit of a weird case, because it uses the value stored in an
output socket as an input. So when we want to determine if the Dot
changed, we also have to check if the Normal output changed.
A cleaner solution would be to refactor this by either storing the normal
on the node directly (instead of in an output socket), or by exposing it
by a separate input. This refactor should be done separately though.
The main issue is that the image and image user is not updated correctly
in `rna_ImageUser_update`. `BKE_image_user_frame_calc` does not set the
correct frame, because the image is null. Also `IMA_GPU_REFRESH` is not
set for the same reason.
When gpu materials are first created, it is expected that the frame is set
correctly, and the flag is set if necessary. Therefore, somewhere during
depsgraph evaluation, those have to be updated. The depsgraph node
to do the update existed already. Now there is a new relation so that it is
executed when the node tree changed, not only when the frame changed.
This is partially caused by a stupid mistake in cfa53e0fbe
where I missed initializing the `vert_normals` pointer in
`MResolvePixelData`. It's also caused by questionable assumptions
from DerivedMesh code that vertex normals would be valid.
The fix used here is to create a temporary mesh with the data necessary
to compute vertex normals, and ensure them here. This is used because
normal calculation is only implemented for `Mesh` and edit mesh, not
`DerivedMesh`. While this might not be great for performance, it's
potentially aligned with future refactoring of this code to remove
`DerivedMesh` completely. Since this is one of the last places the data
structure is used, that would be a great improvement.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D13960
The crash was happening when the mesh had loose edges.
Loose edges are not part of OpenSubdiv topology and hence should not be
communicated to the refiner. Pass ta boolean flag indicating whether an
edge is loose or not in the mesh foreach routines, which seems to be
the easiest way.
Under some circumstances, simply adding a curve object and going
to edit mode would cause a crash. This is because the evaluated
`CurveEval` was accessed but also freed by the dependency graph.
The fix reverts the part of b76918717d that uses the
`CurveEval` for the curve object bounds. While this isn't ideal,
it was the previous behavior, and some unexpected behavior
with object bounds is much better than a crash. Plus, given the plans
of using the new "Curves" data-block for evaluated curves, this
situation will change relatively soon anyway.
Account for `CurveEval`, which stores the proper deformed and
procedurally created data, unlike the `nurb` list, which has always
just meant a copy of the original curve.
Also account for the case when the curve is empty by using a -1, 1,
fallback bounding box in that case, just like mesh objects.
Since we have a node that sets a mesh's auto smooth angle
(unfortunately, in retrospect), we generally can't assume at all
that value is the same as whatever input mesh. Similar asserts
were removed previously in 8216b759e9. While the attempt
at assertions to clarify assumptions is noble, this one doesn't
make sense anymore.
I found this while investigating T95479.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D14009
Iterating over scene's objects while we modify those (through proxy to
override conversion code) is call for problems (use after free etc.).
Instead, all proxy objects need to be gathered first in a temporary
list, and processed all at once in a second loop.
