A couple of mistakes since the light linking commit:
- The +1 got missed in some of the refactors in the branch
- The order of arguments to the shadow path split was wrong
Pull Request: https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/pulls/108420
The original names were `...update_position()`, but no update in
position is performed in these functions, rather, the entries in
`LightSample` are updated. Also make clear that the functions are used
by MNEE.
Only Embree CPU BVH was built in the multi-device case. However, one
Embree GPU BVH is needed per GPU, so we now reuse the same logic as in
the other backends.
Pull Request: https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/pulls/107992
Used to be https://archive.blender.org/developer/D17123.
Internally these are already using the same code path anyways, there's no point in maintaining two distinct nodes.
The obvious approach would be to add Anisotropy controls to the Glossy BSDF node and remove the Anisotropic BSDF node. However, that would break forward compability, since older Blender versions don't know how to handle the Anisotropy input on the Glossy BSDF node.
Therefore, this commit technically removes the Glossy BSDF node, uses versioning to replace them with an Anisotropic BSDF node, and renames that node to "Glossy BSDF".
That way, when you open a new file in an older version, all the nodes show up as Anisotropic BSDF nodes and render correctly.
This is a bit ugly internally since we need to preserve the old `idname` which now no longer matches the UI name, but that's not too bad.
Also removes the "Sharp" distribution option and replaces it with GGX, sets Roughness to zero and disconnects any input to the Roughness socket.
Pull Request: https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/pulls/104445
NanoVDB headers have unused code using "double" type, which is not supported on Arc GPUs.
Recent DPC++ changes enforced runtime verifications:
7663dc201d
which prevents execution when such type has been present even if unused.
This is a solution to avoid double to be compiled at all, similar as how it is done for Metal.
Area light sampling use special techniques to reduce noise with small
spread angles; the change in sampled area was not taken into
consideration when computing the pdf in MNEE.
Pull Request: https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/pulls/107897
After the removal of the Shadow pass this no longer worked. Now it works by
marking the object as a shadow catcher and returning the Shadow Catcher pass.
The result is different than before, since it also takes into account indirect
light now and uses a different method to weight the contribution of lights that
is adaptive to the light strength.
This will make further changes for light linking easier, where we want to
build multiple trees specialized for each light linking set.
It's also easier to understand than the stack used previously.
Pull Request: https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/pulls/107560
In some cases comments at the end of control statements were wrapped
onto new lines which made it read as if they applied to the next line
instead of the (now) previous line.
Relocate comments to the previous line or in some cases the end of the
line (before the brace) to avoid confusion.
Note that in quite a few cases these blocks didn't read well
even before MultiLine was used as comments after the brace caused
wrapping across multiple lines in a way that didn't follow
formatting used everywhere else.
There were two issues here preventing the proper display of the IES
files in question.
The primary one was that these lights are actually vertical. Their
profiles actually point upwards from 90deg to 180deg but our parser was
trying hard to adjust it to start at 0deg incorrectly.
Lastly, the files in question ended with the parser in the `eof`
state - they are "missing" the final carriage return that other IES
files tend to have but other viewers don't seem to mind. Change the
`eof` check instead for a better one that will indicate if any parsing
errors occurred along the way.
Pull Request: https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/pulls/107320
The intersection distance offset in Cycles could have returned
a denormal floating point value for the input values of 0 (and
for the denormal input value).
This could lead to a situation when ray is unable to be advanced
when it hits an edge between two triangles: the intersection will
keep bouncing between two adjacent triangles. This is because the
ray->tmin is compared inclusively, and 0 >= <denormal zero>.
The solution is to return the smallest possible normalized floating
point value from the intersection_t_offset if the input is zero
or a denormal value (which is covered by the same t == 0 check).
This fix is hard to measure on the user level. The old code did
not cause any infinite traversal loop because of the way how the
integration is organized (some kernels offset ray.P, others check
for the number of bounces). It is possible that this fixes some
corner cases of noise: i.e. if some shadow rays falsefully were
considered occluded due to reached maximum number of bounces.
The actual problematic case was discovered during working on a
prototype which had an in-lined intersection loop with the ray
tmin offset.
Pull Request: https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/pulls/107364
