Note: Initially committed as 7705e49bcd, but got reverted with
1f0520034a. Note includes fixes for unit tests.
If an asset library was pointing to the same path as the current file is saved
in, the assets from this library wouldn't be loaded. This is because the asset
library service assumed the absolute library root path is a way to uniquely
identify an asset library.
Instead, identify the asset library using both the root path and the library
type.
The hash tables and vector blenlib headers were pulling many more
headers than they actually need, including the C base math header,
our C string API header, and the StringRef header. All of this
potentially slows down compilation and polutes autocomplete
with unrelated information.
Also remove the `ListBase` constructor for `Vector`. It wasn't used
much, and making it easy to use `ListBase` isn't worth it for the
same reasons mentioned above.
It turns out a lot of files depended on indirect includes of
`BLI_string.h` and `BLI_listbase.h`, so those are fixed here.
Pull Request: https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/pulls/111801
Although I don't like the idea of using owning raw pointers in new APIs
like this (violates fundamental C++ good practises), this type is mostly
meant for writing to files via DNA. So we have to use Blender's memory
management via the guarded allocator here.
Considered making this an alternative function, but then we'd have to
duplicate logif or duplicate memory or so. Not worth it to me.
Listing the "Blender Foundation" as copyright holder implied the Blender
Foundation holds copyright to files which may include work from many
developers.
While keeping copyright on headers makes sense for isolated libraries,
Blender's own code may be refactored or moved between files in a way
that makes the per file copyright holders less meaningful.
Copyright references to the "Blender Foundation" have been replaced with
"Blender Authors", with the exception of `./extern/` since these this
contains libraries which are more isolated, any changed to license
headers there can be handled on a case-by-case basis.
Some directories in `./intern/` have also been excluded:
- `./intern/cycles/` it's own `AUTHORS` file is planned.
- `./intern/opensubdiv/`.
An "AUTHORS" file has been added, using the chromium projects authors
file as a template.
Design task: #110784
Ref !110783.
No user visible changes expected.
This brings us another step closer to replacing the temporary asset
handle design with the proper asset representation design. I held off
with this a bit because we eventually want to support non-ID assets, but
for now it is fine to consider all assets to be IDs. In future the asset
system can make the necessary distinctions still.
Now only the preview is handled via asset handle still.
A lot of files were missing copyright field in the header and
the Blender Foundation contributed to them in a sense of bug
fixing and general maintenance.
This change makes it explicit that those files are at least
partially copyrighted by the Blender Foundation.
Note that this does not make it so the Blender Foundation is
the only holder of the copyright in those files, and developers
who do not have a signed contract with the foundation still
hold the copyright as well.
Another aspect of this change is using SPDX format for the
header. We already used it for the license specification,
and now we state it for the copyright as well, following the
FAQ:
https://reuse.software/faq/
No user visible changes expected.
For brush assets, we need a way to store a reference to a brush in .blend files, so that the last active brush can be restored from the file. See #101908. It seems like a generally useful thing to have.
Adds a new DNA struct to store a "weak" asset reference, that is, a reference that can break under a number of circumstances, but should work reliably enough under normal usage. There's no way to reliably reference an asset currently, so this works on a "best effort" basis. It can break when assets are moved inside the asset library, asset libraries are unregistered from the Preferences, or a file is opened on a different machine with different Preferences, for example. It can also break currently if an asset library is renamed.
It contains:
- Information to identify the asset library the asset can be found in.
- A relative "identifier" (currently a relative path) for the asset within the asset library.
There's further code to resolve a weak reference to file paths and Blender library paths.
Part of #101908.
Co-authored-by: Bastien Montagne <bastien@blender.org>
Pull Request: https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/pulls/105603
The goal is to solve confusion of the "All rights reserved" for licensing
code under an open-source license.
The phrase "All rights reserved" comes from a historical convention that
required this phrase for the copyright protection to apply. This convention
is no longer relevant.
However, even though the phrase has no meaning in establishing the copyright
it has not lost meaning in terms of licensing.
This change makes it so code under the Blender Foundation copyright does
not use "all rights reserved". This is also how the GPL license itself
states how to apply it to the source code:
<one line to give the program's name and a brief idea of what it does.>
Copyright (C) <year> <name of author>
This program is free software ...
This change does not change copyright notice in cases when the copyright
is dual (BF and an author), or just an author of the code. It also does
mot change copyright which is inherited from NaN Holding BV as it needs
some further investigation about what is the proper way to handle it.
The catalog tree is a unit on its own, and should be tested separately.
This makes the testing files smaller and more focused, which can help
maintaining them.
This manages setting up asset library directories for testing, which is
useful for testing multiple asset library related compontents. So move
it to a common header. No reason to squeeze everything into one file
then.
Adds a new `source/blender/asset_system` directory and moves asset
related files from BKE to it. More asset related code can follow
(e.g. asset indexing, ED_assetlist stuff) but needs further work to
untangle it. I also kept `BKE_asset.h` and `asset.cc` as is, since they
deal with asset DNA data mostly, thus make sense in BKE.
Motivation:
- Makes the asset system design more present (term wasn't even used in
code before).
- An `asset_system` directory is quite descriptive (trivial to identify
core asset system features) and makes it easy to find asset code.
- Asset system is mostly runtime data, with little relation to other
`Main`/BKE/DNA types.
- There's a lot of stuff in BKE already. It shouldn't be just a dump for
all stuff that seems core enough.
- Being its own directly helps us be more mindful about encapsulating
the module well, and avoiding dependencies on other modules.
- We can be more free with splitting files here than in BKE.
- In future there might be an asset system BPY module, which would then
map quite nicely to the `asset_system` directory.
Checked with some other core devs, consensus seems that this makes
sense.
