approach does not work very well.
Using a cross section estimate still causes large oscillations due to
varying hair force based on angles. It also requires a sensible hair
thickness value (particle radius) which is difficult to control and
visualize at this point.
The new model is based purely on per-vertex forces, which seems to be
much more stable. It's also somewhat justified by the fact that each
hair vertex represents a certain mass.
Conflicts:
source/blender/physics/intern/BPH_mass_spring.cpp
db2ac79fc7