Files
test2/source/blender/nodes/geometry/node_geometry_util.hh

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

85 lines
3.4 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

/* SPDX-FileCopyrightText: 2023 Blender Authors
*
* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */
#pragma once
#include "MEM_guardedalloc.h"
#include "BKE_node.hh"
#include "BKE_node_socket_value.hh"
Geometry Nodes: initial scattering and geometry nodes This is the initial merge from the geometry-nodes branch. Nodes: * Attribute Math * Boolean * Edge Split * Float Compare * Object Info * Point Distribute * Point Instance * Random Attribute * Random Float * Subdivision Surface * Transform * Triangulate It includes the initial evaluation of geometry node groups in the Geometry Nodes modifier. Notes on the Generic attribute access API The API adds an indirection for attribute access. That has the following benefits: * Most code does not have to care about how an attribute is stored internally. This is mainly necessary, because we have to deal with "legacy" attributes such as vertex weights and attributes that are embedded into other structs such as vertex positions. * When reading from an attribute, we generally don't care what domain the attribute is stored on. So we want to abstract away the interpolation that that adapts attributes from one domain to another domain (this is not actually implemented yet). Other possible improvements for later iterations include: * Actually implement interpolation between domains. * Don't use inheritance for the different attribute types. A single class for read access and one for write access might be enough, because we know all the ways in which attributes are stored internally. We don't want more different internal structures in the future. On the contrary, ideally we can consolidate the different storage formats in the future to reduce the need for this indirection. * Remove the need for heap allocations when creating attribute accessors. It includes commits from: * Dalai Felinto * Hans Goudey * Jacques Lucke * Léo Depoix
2020-12-02 13:25:25 +01:00
#include "NOD_geometry_exec.hh"
#include "NOD_register.hh"
#include "NOD_socket_declarations.hh"
#include "NOD_socket_declarations_geometry.hh"
#include "node_util.hh"
struct BVHTreeFromMesh;
struct GeometrySet;
namespace blender::nodes {
class GatherAddNodeSearchParams;
class GatherLinkSearchOpParams;
} // namespace blender::nodes
void geo_node_type_base(bNodeType *ntype, int type, const char *name, short nclass);
bool geo_node_poll_default(const bNodeType *ntype,
const bNodeTree *ntree,
const char **r_disabled_hint);
namespace blender::nodes {
bool check_tool_context_and_error(GeoNodeExecParams &params);
void search_link_ops_for_tool_node(GatherLinkSearchOpParams &params);
void search_link_ops_for_volume_grid_node(GatherLinkSearchOpParams &params);
void get_closest_in_bvhtree(BVHTreeFromMesh &tree_data,
const VArray<float3> &positions,
BLI: refactor IndexMask for better performance and memory usage Goals of this refactor: * Reduce memory consumption of `IndexMask`. The old `IndexMask` uses an `int64_t` for each index which is more than necessary in pretty much all practical cases currently. Using `int32_t` might still become limiting in the future in case we use this to index e.g. byte buffers larger than a few gigabytes. We also don't want to template `IndexMask`, because that would cause a split in the "ecosystem", or everything would have to be implemented twice or templated. * Allow for more multi-threading. The old `IndexMask` contains a single array. This is generally good but has the problem that it is hard to fill from multiple-threads when the final size is not known from the beginning. This is commonly the case when e.g. converting an array of bool to an index mask. Currently, this kind of code only runs on a single thread. * Allow for efficient set operations like join, intersect and difference. It should be possible to multi-thread those operations. * It should be possible to iterate over an `IndexMask` very efficiently. The most important part of that is to avoid all memory access when iterating over continuous ranges. For some core nodes (e.g. math nodes), we generate optimized code for the cases of irregular index masks and simple index ranges. To achieve these goals, a few compromises had to made: * Slicing of the mask (at specific indices) and random element access is `O(log #indices)` now, but with a low constant factor. It should be possible to split a mask into n approximately equally sized parts in `O(n)` though, making the time per split `O(1)`. * Using range-based for loops does not work well when iterating over a nested data structure like the new `IndexMask`. Therefor, `foreach_*` functions with callbacks have to be used. To avoid extra code complexity at the call site, the `foreach_*` methods support multi-threading out of the box. The new data structure splits an `IndexMask` into an arbitrary number of ordered `IndexMaskSegment`. Each segment can contain at most `2^14 = 16384` indices. The indices within a segment are stored as `int16_t`. Each segment has an additional `int64_t` offset which allows storing arbitrary `int64_t` indices. This approach has the main benefits that segments can be processed/constructed individually on multiple threads without a serial bottleneck. Also it reduces the memory requirements significantly. For more details see comments in `BLI_index_mask.hh`. I did a few tests to verify that the data structure generally improves performance and does not cause regressions: * Our field evaluation benchmarks take about as much as before. This is to be expected because we already made sure that e.g. add node evaluation is vectorized. The important thing here is to check that changes to the way we iterate over the indices still allows for auto-vectorization. * Memory usage by a mask is about 1/4 of what it was before in the average case. That's mainly caused by the switch from `int64_t` to `int16_t` for indices. In the worst case, the memory requirements can be larger when there are many indices that are very far away. However, when they are far away from each other, that indicates that there aren't many indices in total. In common cases, memory usage can be way lower than 1/4 of before, because sub-ranges use static memory. * For some more specific numbers I benchmarked `IndexMask::from_bools` in `index_mask_from_selection` on 10.000.000 elements at various probabilities for `true` at every index: ``` Probability Old New 0 4.6 ms 0.8 ms 0.001 5.1 ms 1.3 ms 0.2 8.4 ms 1.8 ms 0.5 15.3 ms 3.0 ms 0.8 20.1 ms 3.0 ms 0.999 25.1 ms 1.7 ms 1 13.5 ms 1.1 ms ``` Pull Request: https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/pulls/104629
2023-05-24 18:11:41 +02:00
const IndexMask &mask,
MutableSpan<int> r_indices,
MutableSpan<float> r_distances_sq,
MutableSpan<float3> r_positions);
Geometry Nodes: Curve and mesh topology access nodes This patch contains an initial set of nodes to access basic mesh topology information, as explored in T100020. The nodes allow six direct topology mappings for meshes: - **Corner -> Face** The face a corner is in, the index in the face - **Vertex -> Edge** Choose an edge attached to the vertex - **Vertex -> Corner** Choose a corner attached to the vertex - **Corner -> Edge** The next and previous edge at each face corner - **Corner -> Vertex** The vertex associated with a corner - **Corner -> Corner** Offset a corner index within a face And two new topology mappings for curves: - **Curve -> Points** Choose a point within a curve - **Point -> Curve** The curve a point is in, the index in the curve The idea is that some of the 16 possible mesh mappings are more important, and that this is a useful set of nodes to start exploring this area. For mappings with an arbitrary number of connections, we must sort them and use an index to choose a single element, because geometry nodes does not support list fields. Note that the sort index has repeating behavior as it goes over the "Total" number of connections, and negative sort indices choose from the end. Currently which of the "start" elements is used is determined by the field context, so the "Field at Index" and "Interpolate Domain" nodes will be quite important. Also, currently the "Sort Index" inputs are clamped to the number of connections. One important feature that isn't implemented here is using the winding order for the output elements. This can be a separate mode for some of these nodes. It will be optional because of the performance impact. There are several todos for separate commits after this: - Rename "Control Point Neighbors" to be consistent with this naming - Version away the "Vertex Neighbors" node which is fully redundant now - Implement a special case for when no weights are used for performance - De-duplicating some of the sorting logic between the nodes - Improve performance and memory use of topology mappings - Look into caching some of the mappings on meshes Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D16029
2022-09-28 14:38:27 -05:00
int apply_offset_in_cyclic_range(IndexRange range, int start_index, int offset);
void mix_baked_data_item(eNodeSocketDatatype socket_type,
void *prev,
const void *next,
const float factor);
namespace enums {
const EnumPropertyItem *attribute_type_type_with_socket_fn(bContext * /*C*/,
PointerRNA * /*ptr*/,
PropertyRNA * /*prop*/,
bool *r_free);
bool generic_attribute_type_supported(const EnumPropertyItem &item);
const EnumPropertyItem *domain_experimental_grease_pencil_version3_fn(bContext * /*C*/,
PointerRNA * /*ptr*/,
PropertyRNA * /*prop*/,
bool *r_free);
const EnumPropertyItem *domain_without_corner_experimental_grease_pencil_version3_fn(
bContext * /*C*/, PointerRNA * /*ptr*/, PropertyRNA * /*prop*/, bool *r_free);
} // namespace enums
bool custom_data_type_supports_grids(eCustomDataType data_type);
const EnumPropertyItem *grid_custom_data_type_items_filter_fn(bContext *C,
PointerRNA *ptr,
PropertyRNA *prop,
bool *r_free);
const EnumPropertyItem *grid_socket_type_items_filter_fn(bContext *C,
PointerRNA *ptr,
PropertyRNA *prop,
bool *r_free);
void node_geo_exec_with_missing_openvdb(GeoNodeExecParams &params);
Geometry Nodes: support baking data block references With this patch, materials are kept intact in simulation zones and bake nodes without any additional user action. This implements the design proposed in #108410 to support referencing data-blocks (only materials for now) in the baked data. The task also describes why this is not a trivial issue. A previous attempt was implemented in #109703 but it didn't work well-enough. The solution is to have an explicit `name (+ library name) -> data-block` mapping that is stored in the modifier for each bake node and simulation zone. The `library name` is necessary for it to be unique within a .blend file. Note that this refers to the name of the `Library` data-block and not a file path. The baked data only contains the names of the used data-blocks. When the baked data is loaded, the correct material data-block is looked up from the mapping. ### Automatic Mapping Generation The most tricky aspect of this approach is to make it feel mostly automatic. From the user point-of-view, it should just work. Therefore, we don't want the user to have to create the mapping manually in the majority of cases. Creating the mapping automatically is difficult because the data-blocks that should become part of the mapping are only known during depsgraph evaluation. So we somehow have to gather the missing data blocks during evaluation and then write the new mappings back to the original data. While writing back to original data is something we do in some cases already, the situation here is different, because we are actually creating new relations between data-blocks. This also means that we'll have to do user-counting. Since user counts in data-blocks are *not* atomic, we can't do that from multiple threads at the same time. Also, under some circumstances, it may be necessary to trigger depsgraph evaluation again after the write-back because it actually affects the result. To solve this, a small new API is added in `DEG_depsgraph_writeback_sync.hh`. It allows gathering tasks which write back to original data in a synchronous way which may also require a reevaluation. ### Accessing the Mapping A new `BakeDataBlockMap` is passed to geometry nodes evaluation by the modifier. This map allows getting the `ID` pointer that should be used for a specific data-block name that is stored in baked data. It's also used to gather all the missing data mappings during evaluation. ### Weak ID References The baked/cached geometries may have references to other data-blocks (currently only materials, but in the future also e.g. instanced objects/collections). However, the pointers of these data-blocks are not stable over time. That is especially true when storing/loading the data from disk, but also just when playing back the animation. Therefore, the used data-blocks have to referenced in a different way at run-time. This is solved by adding `std::unique_ptr<bake::BakeMaterialsList>` to the run-time data of various geometry data-blocks. If the data-block is cached over a longer period of time (such that material pointers can't be used directly), it stores the material name (+ library name) used by each material slot. When the geometry is used again, the material pointers are restored using these weak name references and the `BakeDataBlockMap`. ### Manual Mapping Management There is a new `Data-Blocks` panel in the bake settings in the node editor sidebar that allows inspecting and modifying the data-blocks that are used when baking. The user can change what data-block a specific name is mapped to. Pull Request: https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/pulls/117043
2024-02-01 09:21:55 +01:00
void draw_data_blocks(const bContext *C, uiLayout *layout, PointerRNA &bake_rna);
} // namespace blender::nodes