From d1d90ecbecd9e4f6d9b88cfaa26404dbde99504d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Cl=C3=A9ment=20Foucault?= <foucault.clem@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 18:01:26 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Cleanup: MEM: Remove outdated comment

---
 intern/guardedalloc/MEM_guardedalloc.h | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/intern/guardedalloc/MEM_guardedalloc.h b/intern/guardedalloc/MEM_guardedalloc.h
index d5efc16b4ea..6fb9021fac1 100644
--- a/intern/guardedalloc/MEM_guardedalloc.h
+++ b/intern/guardedalloc/MEM_guardedalloc.h
@@ -312,8 +312,6 @@ template<typename T> inline T *MEM_cnew(const char *allocation_name)
 {
   static_assert(std::is_trivial_v<T>, "For non-trivial types, MEM_new should be used.");
   if (alignof(T) <= MEM_MIN_CPP_ALIGNMENT) {
-    /* TODO: Could possibly cover more cases, like alignment of 8 or 16. Need to be careful as the
-     * alignment of MEM_callocN is not really guaranteed. */
     return static_cast<T *>(MEM_callocN(sizeof(T), allocation_name));
   }
   void *ptr = MEM_mallocN_aligned(sizeof(T), alignof(T), allocation_name);