Adjust various unit tests so that they no longer use the legacy Action
API (which was deprecated in Blender 4.4 and will be removed in 5.0).
No functional changes.
This is part of #146586
Pull Request: https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/pulls/147060
The name `id_root` was not descriptive, and was just a hold-over from the
equivalent (now deprecated) property on the Action itself. `target_id_type`
is more clear, reflecting that this is the type of ID the Slot is intended
to animate.
This PR also renames the corresponding `id_root_icon` to
`target_id_type_icon`.
Note that this PR updates the GLTF import/export core addon to adhere to
these name changes as well.
Pull Request: https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/pulls/133164
`Action.slots.new()` in the Python API previously took either an ID or nothing
as a parameter. In the former case it would create a slot with the appropriate
`id_root` and name for that ID. In the latter case it would create a default
slot with an unspecified `id_root` and default name.
This had several issues:
1. You couldn't create a slot with a specific `id_root` without already having
an ID of that type. In theory this isn't a problem, but in practice in larger
scripts/addons you don't necessarily have such an ID on hand at the call
site.
2. You couldn't directly create a slot with a desired name without an existing
ID with that name. This isn't so important, since you can always just set the
name afterwards. But it's a bit annoying.
3. Most other `new()` APIs in Blender *require* you to specify the name of the
item being created. So calling this with no parameters was violating that
norm.
4. Ideally, we want to eliminate unspecified `id_root`s, since they cause other
weirdness in the API such as slot identifiers changing upon slot assignment.
To resolve these issues, and just generally to make the API more
straightforward, this PR changes `slots.new()` to take two required parameters:
an ID type and a name. For example:
`slots.new(id_type='CAMERA', name="My Camera Data Slot")`.
This fully specifies everything needed for the slot identifier upon creation,
and doesn't require any outside data items to create a slot with the desired
type and name.
In the future if we decide we still want a `for_id`-style slot creation API, we
can reintroduce it as a separate function.
Ref: #130892
Pull Request: https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/pulls/130970
This commit takes the 'Slotted Actions' out of the experimental phase.
As a result:
- All newly created Actions will be slotted Actions.
- Legacy Actions loaded from disk will be versioned to slotted Actions.
- The new Python API for slots, layers, strips, and channel bags is
available.
- The legacy Python API for accessing F-Curves and Action Groups is
still available, and will operate on the F-Curves/Groups for the first
slot only.
- Creating an Action by keying (via the UI, operators, or the
`rna_struct.keyframe_insert` function) will try and share Actions
between related data-blocks. See !126655 for more info about this.
- Assigning an Action to a data-block will auto-assign a suitable Action
Slot. The logic for this is described below. However, There are cases
where this does _not_ automatically assign a slot, and thus the Action
will effectively _not_ animate the data-block. Effort has been spent
to make Action selection work both reliably for Blender users as well
as keep the behaviour the same for Python scripts. Where these two
goals did not converge, reliability and understandability for users
was prioritised.
Auto-selection of the Action Slot upon assigning the Action works as
follows. The first rule to find a slot wins.
1. The data-block remembers the slot name that was last assigned. If the
newly assigned Action has a slot with that name, it is chosen.
2. If the Action has a slot with the same name as the data-block, it is
chosen.
3. If the Action has only one slot, and it has never been assigned to
anything, it is chosen.
4. If the Action is assigned to an NLA strip or an Action constraint,
and the Action has a single slot, and that slot has a suitable ID
type, it is chosen.
This last step is what I was referring to with "Where these two goals
did not converge, reliability and understandability for users was
prioritised." For regular Action assignments (like via the Action
selectors in the Properties editor) this rule doesn't apply, even though
with legacy Actions the final state ("it is animated by this Action")
differs from the final state with slotted Actions ("it has no slot so is
not animated"). This is done to support the following workflow:
- Create an Action by animating Cube.
- In order to animate Suzanne with that same Action, assign the Action
to Suzanne.
- Start keying Suzanne. This auto-creates and auto-assigns a new slot
for Suzanne.
If rule 4. above would apply in this case, the 2nd step would
automatically select the Cube slot for Suzanne as well, which would
immediately overwrite Suzanne's properties with the Cube animation.
Technically, this commit:
- removes the `WITH_ANIM_BAKLAVA` build flag,
- removes the `use_animation_baklava` experimental flag in preferences,
- updates the code to properly deal with the fact that empty Actions are
now always considered slotted/layered Actions (instead of that relying
on the user preference).
Note that 'slotted Actions' and 'layered Actions' are the exact same
thing, just focusing on different aspects (slot & layers) of the new
data model.
The "Baklava phase 1" assumptions are still asserted. This means that:
- an Action can have zero or one layer,
- that layer can have zero or one strip,
- that strip must be of type 'keyframe' and be infinite with zero
offset.
The code to handle legacy Actions is NOT removed in this commit. It will
be removed later. For now it's likely better to keep it around as
reference to the old behaviour in order to aid in some inevitable
bugfixing.
Ref: #120406
When creating a new NLA strip for an action, as well as when setting
`strip.action` via RNA, use the generic action-assignment code. This
ensures that the slot selection follows the same logic as other Action
assignments.
If the generic slot selection doesn't find a suitable slot, and there is
a single slot on that Action of a suitable ID type, always assign it.
This is to support the following scenario:
- Python script creates an Action and adds F-Curves via the legacy API.
- This creates a slot 'XXSlot'.
- The script creates multiple NLA strips for that Action.
- The desired result is that these strips get the same Slot assigned as
well.
The generic code doesn't work for this, because:
- The first strip assignment would see the slot `XXSlot` (`XX`
indicating "not bound to any ID type yet"). Because that slot has
never been used, it will be assigned (which is good). This assignment
would change its name to, for example, `OBSlot`.
- The second strip assignment would not see a 'virgin' slot, and thus
not auto-select `OBSlot`. This behaviour makes sense when assigning
Actions in the Action editor (assigning an Action that already
animates 'Cube' to 'Suzanne' should not assign the 'OBCube' slot to
Suzanne), but for the NLA I feel that it could be a bit more
'enthousiastic' in auto-picking a slot to support the above case.
This is preparation for the removal of the 'Slotted Actions'
experimental flag, and getting the new code to run as compatibly as
possible with the legacy code.
The return value of `animrig::nla::assign_action()` has changed a bit.
It used to indicate whether a slot was auto-selected; it now indicates
whether the Action assignment was successful. Whether a slot was
assigned or not can be seen at `strip.action_slot`.
Pull Request: https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/pulls/128892
Clear the entire scene at the start of every test case. Previously this
happened only at the start of the test suite. This should make tests
more independent.
No functional changes to the actual tests.
