We can not rely on edit->psys, it is not set for particle edit,
and there is some logic deeper inside which does different things
dependent on that.
We need to replace those checks with some some HAIR vs. PARTICLES
flag and always set psys pointer.
The idea is that edit mode structure is owned by original object,
and used for drawing. This is a bit confusing, especially since
path cache is also in that structure and needs evaluated object
to calculate cache.
In the future we should split edit data from visualization data,
but that's bigger refactor.
Freeing sequencer would always do usercount, which is now forbidden when
called from main ID freeing code.
Annoying in 2.7x, much more critical issue in 2.8!
Also, moved RNA sequencer API functions to proper rna_scene_api.c file.
Two things to indicate (which als apply before the DM → M port):
- Face count in the UI is not updated and stays at 0
- When planar mode is used, the result is inverted (mirrored along X)
compared to 2.79
Reviewers: sybren
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D3303
Bone selection overlay is only available in pose mode.
and when active overrules the selection buffer.
This is currently `tricked` by switching the draw engines, but this is
an exception. Not sure how to solve this in a better way.
After this is solved we can look at how to localize the dim effect to only the objects connected to the active armatures. Currently it dims the whole screen (including background).
@campbellbarton I added you as reviewer as it you have done a lot in the DRW_draw_select_loop
Reviewers: campbellbarton, fclem
Reviewed By: fclem
Subscribers: campbellbarton
Tags: #bf_blender_2.8, #code_quest
Maniphest Tasks: T54983
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D3241
Initial add-cube tool which uses the scale cage to resize.
The 3D cursor is currently used to project the cursor onto.
We'll likely have more orientation options in the future.
Bvhtrees take up a lot of memory space, reusing the common bvhtree of looptris to snap to vertices and edges is a good way to save memory.
Unfortunately we have a worsening performance in the snapping operation around 63% (addition to the original time).
But as we often do not need to build a bvhtree of loose verts and loose edges, we have an improvement in cache time :)
Since the CPU time of snapping operations (no matter how higth poly the object is) corresponds to less than 0.01% of all CPU time of a blender frame, that change is not really significant.
Snapping operations on a mesh in edit mode have not changed significantly.
Signed-off-by: Germano <germano.costa@ig.com.br>
