This was due to the fact the drawing code was expecting the editpoints
to be equaly spaced. Reuse the code in particle.c to output the select
mask in red color channel of the particle (which is unused in new code).
The dependency graph has to know whether a driver must be re-evaluated
every frame due to a dependency on the current frame number. For python
drivers it was using a heuristic based on searching for certain sub-
strings in the expression, notably including '('.
When the expression is actually evaluated using Python, this can't be
easily improved; however if the Simple Expression evaluator is used,
this check can be done precisely by accessing the parsed data.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D6624
The full name was "Topology Slide/Relax", but it didn't fit in the
toolbar UI. This was causing some problems:
- The mesh filter that does the same thing is called "Relax"
- We may want to add a "Topology Brush" tool in the future that is more
oriented to retopology task (like creating strips of quads), so by doing
this we avoid having two tools with the same name in the UI.
Reviewed By: billreynish
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D6590
Waveform is freed in `sound_load_audio()` when sound length is `queried by BKE_sound_info_get()`.
Add argument free_waveform, so `BKE_sound_info_get()` can skip waveform freeing, as it is not expected to alter sound.
Reviewed By: sybren
Differential Revision: http://developer.blender.org/D6053
Refactor code to use `eSpaceSeq_Proxy_RenderSize` or corresponding `IMB_Proxy_Size`
enum items directly.
`SEQ_PROXY_RENDER_SIZE_100` has assigned value 99 to distinguish from `SEQ_PROXY_RENDER_SIZE_FULL`.
This caused error in image size calculation and because of that image had to be scaled.
Author: EitanSomething
Reviewed By: ISS
Differential Revision: http://developer.blender.org/D6368
This data is only used to get current time/frame value, which is never
mandatory to add a modifier.
Needed by incoming fix to support particles modifiers in liboverrides.
The `give_parvert()` function was only considering the mesh's original
vertex indices when the parent vertex index was valid for the evaluated
mesh. However, when using the Mask modifier the evaluated mesh can have
less vertices but still have the parent vertex.
Since the `if (nr < numVertex)` condition wasn't used to prevent any
out-of-bounds access, and seems just an incorrect optimisation, it could
be removed.
This would happen if a tile is found on disk, painting would actually
request that tile (because corresponding uvs were in that range), but
that tile was not added in blenders list of tiles in that Image.
Need to also check tile in `image_quick_test` (regardless of iuser
having passed).
thx @lukasstockner97 for additional input!
Maniphest Tasks: T73110
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D6578
We can't use the fast path when the mesh is used by mulitple objects and so
slower sculpting is expected then. But fake users should not affect this. This
also fixes the same type of error in a few other areas.
Cache file loading for mesh and particle files now works through the direct update_structures functions. The final cache mode now also only bakes the most essential files and is therefore not resumable anymore.
When computing the roll value coming from the handle bone, the code
was using some strange unexplained math. It probably works fine when
the difference with the 'zero roll' orientation is pure twist, like
is the case when called from mat3_to_vec_roll. However, it appears
to break when significant swing is involved.
The issue is fixed by using the proper Swing+Twist decomposition
utility function that was added in a recent version for drivers.
Once again, am not exactly sure why that was working before, and not
anymore - but in any case, doing that kind of update here is not only
useless (since we have to do it at the end of the whole
collections/objects duplication and remapping anyway), it is also rather
dangerous, as collections are currently in rather invalid states at that
point of the code...
Note that in ideal world, `BKE_main_collection_sync()` & co would be
lazy (setting only a flag, then code actually needing this to be valid
again should call some sort of `BKE_main_collection_sync_ensure()`).
Then we would not have to worry about such things (and we'd get nice
performance improvements in some cases, also in main remapping code,
etc.).
Food for some refactoring, some day...
Both actual Collection datablocks and the horrible master collection
should share the same code (there were already some differences,
although probably not critical, but some callbacks from
scene->master_collection did not have the 'not self' flag...).
### Description of the problem
Until now, it is only possible to correctly add a lightprobe in python via an operator:
`bpy.ops.object.lightprobe_add()`
### Description of the proposed solution
The idea of this patch is to fix the lack of consistency lightprobe creation without operator.
It allow creation of different lightprobe type directly via `bpy.data.lightprobes.new(name, type)` (such as for curves).
In order to make it possible I had to:
1. Add a function `BKE_lightprobe_configure` in charge of lightprobe settings configuration (avoid code redundancy)
2. Allow an object to take lightprobe datablock as data during is initialization.
### A short example of this patch usage
```
lp = bpy.data.lightprobes.new('some_name','PLANAR')
bpy.data.objects.new('toto', lp)
```
Reviewed By: fclem
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D6396
This integrates hair collisions with the new cloth collision system,
greatly improving reliability, and reducing the amount of hair-specific
code paths in the cloth code.
The removes all the point constraint based collision stuff, instead
implementing segment impulse based collisions, using the same collision
response code as the normal cloth solver.
The hair system can now also collide with the emitter if it is a
collision object.
Reviewed By: mano-wii, Sebastian Parborg
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D6545
The last handle wasn't corrected, also, there is no reason
to flip the handles while sorting (checking the same handles many times)
move this into it's own loop.
