We need to remove all transform to display during rendering for this to work. The float rect is then color managed when displayed.
This makes all interface colors wrongly displayed because they should be color managed when rendering.
This fixes any function that relied on these iterators such as:
* Outliner Same Type
* Metaballs
* scene.objects
We were not considering the collections when there was collections nested
to the collections nested to the master collection.
It includes a unittest.
Adding new context modes requires adding a string in CTX_data_mode_string,
but there is no error when omitting this other than panels using
incorrect contexts. The static assert should help detect simple
missing strings at least to avoid confusing errors.
This is part of T53495.
This makes sure the master collection is always expanded and you don't even get
the expand/collapse icons for it.
This is only for the Collecions (currently Master Collection Tree) option, not
for active view layer.
This is part of T53495.
This operator is actually using existing code. The only new thing about it is
that it has a shortcut.
It will be exposed in the UI soon together with the nested collection operator.
This is part of T53495.
This operator is intended for the outliner when viewing Collections (at the moment, Master Collection Tree).
It has a shortcut "C", and will be added to a menu shortly.
Fix T52977: Parent bone name disappeared in the UI in pose mode.
Regression caused by own rBc57636f060018. So instead of changing widget
type, just flag it as disabled.
Note that core of the issue is elsewhere though - there is absolutely no
reasons to have a search widget for pointers we cannot change nor
search! But fixing this is not really top priority, one of the many
glitches of our UI code, so think we can live with current code.
To be backported to 2.79a.
This allows users to have "Support", "Rig", "Characters" collections nested to
different collections without having to resort to "House.Rig", "House.Characters"
or "Rig.001", "Characters.003" :/
This is part of T53495.
This fixes renaming the view layer via Python.
This bug was introduced originally in 3a95bdfc65. Although I suspect it was
around for longer, since this commit didn't touch this part of the code.
But basically we need the id of the RNA property to be the one that owns
the data (view layer).
This fixes renaming via the interface.
This bug was introduced originally in 9515737b55. We need the id of the RNA
property to be the one that owns the data (view layer).
So it can't be the window's id, but the scene one instead.
We were bumping user count when duplicating viewlayer and its freestyleconfig
depending on the flag, however when freeing we were always decreasing user
count.
This fixes this and get rid of the assert when running:
`--factory-startup --enable-copy-on-write`
And closing Blender.
The mental model is that a scene collection is a small wrap on top of the master
collection, so all objects are in the master collection at all times.
When we remove a collection there is no reason to remove an object. So if the
object was not linked to any other collection, we add link it to the master one.
We tried to do as much as possible in a single threaded callback, which
lead to using some nasty tricks like fake atomic-based spinlocks to
perform some operations (like float addition, which has no atomic
intrinsics).
While OK with 'standard' low number of working threads (8-16), because
collision were rather rare and implied memory barrier not *that* much
overhead, this performed poorly with more powerful systems reaching the
100 of threads and beyond (like workstations or render farm hardware).
There, both memory barrier overhead and more frequent collisions would
have significant impact on performances.
This was addressed by splitting further the process, we now have three
loops, one over polys, loops and vertices, and we added an intermediate
storage for weighted loop normals. This allows to avoid completely any
atomic operation in body of threaded loops, which should fix scalability
issues. This costs us slightly higher temp memory usage (something like
50Mb per million of polygons on average), but looks like acceptable
tradeoff.
Further more, tests showed that we could gain an additional ~7% of speed
in computing normals of heavy meshes, by also parallelizing the last two
loops (might be 1 or 2% on overall mesh update at best...).
Note that further tweaking in this code should be possible once Sergey
adds the 'minimum batch size' option to threaded foreach API, since very
light loops like the one on loops (mere v3 addition) require much bigger
batches than heavier code (like the one on polys) to keep optimal
performances.
So they are:
House
-> House 1
-> House 2
-> ...
The exception is when the parent collection is the master collection. In this case we get:
Master Collection
-> Collection 1
-> Collection 2
-> ...
This is part of "T53495: View layer and collection editing - Design Task"
This is a bit annoying to have per-DM locking, but it's way better (as in, up to
4 times better) for playback speed when having lots of subsurf objects,
