Listing the "Blender Foundation" as copyright holder implied the Blender
Foundation holds copyright to files which may include work from many
developers.
While keeping copyright on headers makes sense for isolated libraries,
Blender's own code may be refactored or moved between files in a way
that makes the per file copyright holders less meaningful.
Copyright references to the "Blender Foundation" have been replaced with
"Blender Authors", with the exception of `./extern/` since these this
contains libraries which are more isolated, any changed to license
headers there can be handled on a case-by-case basis.
Some directories in `./intern/` have also been excluded:
- `./intern/cycles/` it's own `AUTHORS` file is planned.
- `./intern/opensubdiv/`.
An "AUTHORS" file has been added, using the chromium projects authors
file as a template.
Design task: #110784
Ref !110783.
A lot of files were missing copyright field in the header and
the Blender Foundation contributed to them in a sense of bug
fixing and general maintenance.
This change makes it explicit that those files are at least
partially copyrighted by the Blender Foundation.
Note that this does not make it so the Blender Foundation is
the only holder of the copyright in those files, and developers
who do not have a signed contract with the foundation still
hold the copyright as well.
Another aspect of this change is using SPDX format for the
header. We already used it for the license specification,
and now we state it for the copyright as well, following the
FAQ:
https://reuse.software/faq/
The main goal of these changes is to support checking if some data has
been changed over time. This is used by the WIP simulation nodes during
baking to detect which attributes have to be stored in every frame because
they have changed.
By using a combination of a weak user count and a version counter, it is
possible to detect that an attribute (or any data controlled by implicit
sharing) has not been changed with O(1) memory and time. It's still
possible that the data has been changed multiple times and is the same
in the end and beginning of course. That wouldn't be detected using this
mechanism.
The `ImplicitSharingInfo` struct has a new weak user count. A weak
reference is one that does not keep the referenced data alive, but makes sure
that the `ImplicitSharingInfo` itself is not deleted. If some piece of
data has one strong and multiple weak users, it is still mutable. If the
strong user count goes down to zero, the referenced data is freed.
Remaining weak users can check for this condition using `is_expired`.
This is a bit similar to `std::weak_ptr` but there is an important difference:
a weak user can not become a strong user while one can create a `shared_ptr`
from a `weak_ptr`. This restriction is necessary, because some code might
be changing the referenced data assuming that it is the only owner. If
another thread suddenly adds a new owner, the data would be shared again
and the first thread would not have been allowed to modify the data in
the first place.
There is also a new integer version counter in `ImplicitSharingInfo`.
It is incremented whenever some code wants to modify the referenced data.
Obviously, this can only be done when the data is not shared because then
it would be immutable. By comparing an old and new version number of the
same sharing info, one can check if the data has been modified. One has
to keep a weak reference to the sharing info together with the old version
number to ensure that the new sharing info is still the same as the old one.
Without this, it can happen that the sharing info was freed and a new
one was allocated at the same pointer address. Using a strong reference
for this purpose does not work, because then the data would never be
modified because it's shared.
Generally, one does not know if the sharing info is currently shared
and should therefore be const. Better keep it const almost all the
time and only remove the constness when absolutely necessary
and the code has checked that it is valid.
Similar to 7eee378ecc, this change decreases memory usage and
improves performance when copying curves and meshes without changing
their topology. The same change used for custom data layers is applied
to face and curve offset indices, which aren't stored as a custom data
layer.
The implicit sharing info for the offsets is stored in the mesh and
curve runtime structs, since it doesn't need to be written to files
directly. When changing the offsets pointer directly, the sharing info
must be updated accordingly. To make that easier, a few utility
functions take care of common operations like making an array mutable,
resizing an array, and creating sharing info for allocated data.
This commit also clarifies the intention to not allocate the offsets
at all when there are no curves/faces. That slightly complicates some
of the logic, but there's no reason for the single `0` integer to be
allocated.
Pull Request: https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/pulls/106907
