Two commits that basically do the same thing for two `enum`s: give
them a name.
- the `IDWALK_…` enum → `LibraryForeachIDFlag`.
- the `IDWALK_CB_…` enum → `LibraryForeachIDCallbackFlag`.
This way the flags are type-safe, and it's known where values come
from. This is much preferred (at least by me) to just having `int
flags`.
Uses of `0` have been replaced with `IDWALK_NOP` and `IDWALK_CB_NOP`,
as those have the same value and are of the right type.
One invalid use of `IDWALK_NOP` was detected by this change, and is
replaced by `IDWALK_CB_NOP`. And another one in the opposite
direction.
This change might be incomplete; I gave the enum a name, fixed the
compiler errors, and then also updated assignments like `int cb_flag =
cb_data->cb_flag`. I might have missed some assignments to `int`
though.
No functional changes.
----------
I intend to land this PR as its two separate commits. I just put them in the same PR so the buildbot can handle them in one go, and we don't have a stack of highly relatled PRs.
In the future this could also apply to the `IDWALK_RET_…` enum. This one I left out, though, because a proper cleanup there would also have to include their ambiguity on whether they are bitflags (like the enums in this PR) or not. Their values and the code in `BKE_lib_query_foreachid_process()` implies they are bitflags, but in practice they are never or'ed together and just used as discrete values.
Pull Request: https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/pulls/131803
3ef748789d