Commit 8ff8fc4859 changed the context for the modes in Merge Nodes
and Change Nodes operators to Nodetree. The enum items were thus
extracted using this context, but the UI Menus were not updated to
reflect this change and a few items were no longer translated.
This commit fixes the issue by using the same translation context for
the menus' drawing.
Avoid non valid glTF file by avoiding exporting multiple slots with same target_id_type in the same animation for a single object:
- Make sure to create multiple animation when needed
- Use action.name for active slots (can have multiple slots when different target_id_type)
- Use action.name - slot.name_display for additional animations
The EXTENSIONS_OT_package_install_files instance had its _drop_variables
was temporarily set to True before being storing the extension values.
This value was never read so the assignment can be removed.
Similar to how brush assets are created and managed this
PR allows to export pose assets into a different library.
Because of this there is a limitation to this where each
asset is stored in a separate blend file.
This may be lifted in the future as there are planned changes in
the design phase: #122061
### Create Asset
Now available in the 3D viewport in the "Pose" menu: "Create Pose Asset".
The button in the Dope Sheet will now call this new operator as well.
Clicking either of those will open a popup in which you can:
* Choose the name of the asset, which library and catalog it goes into.
* Clicking "Create" will create a pose asset on disk in the given library.
It is possible to create files into an outside library or add it in the current file.
The latter option does a lot less since it basically just creates the
action and tags it as an asset.
If no Asset Shelf **AND** no Asset Browser is visible anywhere in Blender,
the Asset Shelf will be shown on the 3D viewport from which
the operator was called.
### Adjust Pose Asset
Right clicking a pose asset that has been created in the way described
before will have options to overwrite it.
Only the active object will be considered for updating a pose asset
Available Options (the latter 3 under the "Modify Pose Asset" submenu):
* Adjust Pose Asset: From the selected bones, update ONLY channels that
are also present in the asset. This is the default.
* Replace: Will completely replace the data in the Pose Asset from
the current selection
* Add: Adds the current selection to the Pose Asset. Any already existing
channels have their values updated
* Remove: Remove selected bones from the pose asset
Currently this refreshes the thumbnail. In the case of custom
thumbnails it might not be something want
### Deleting an existing Pose Asset
Right click on a Pose Asset and hit "Delete Pose Asset". Works in the shelf
and in the asset library. Doing so will pop up a confirmation dialog,
if confirming, the asset is gone forever. Deleting a local asset is basically the
same as clearing the asset. This is a bit confusing because you get
two options that basically do the same thing sometimes,
but "Delete" works in other cases as well.
I currently don't see a way around that.
Part of design #131840
Pull Request: https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/pulls/132747
Rename `ActionKeyframeStrip.channels()` to `.channelbag()`, and change
its first parameter from `slot_handle` to `slot`.
This is to be consistent with `ActionKeyframeStrip.channelbags`, which is
the array of channelbags in the keyframe strip. Having a function that's
singluar makes sense for finding a single element in the array.
The change from using the slot handle to using the slot is to be consistent
with `.channelbags.new(slot)`. Furthermore, the Python API should be using
slot handles as little as possible (they're basically meaningless numbers).
Using the slots directly is preferred. If that's not possible, it is
recommended to use the slot identifier (`slot.identifier`) instead, as that
can be used to look up the slot (`action.slots[slot_identifier]`).
This breaks the glTF add-on, which will be fixed in !133915.
Pull Request: https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/pulls/133868
Use string formatting instead of the `+` operator, so that it doesn't
matter which exact type is used for the `rig_id` custom property.
Also reshuffle the code a bit to reduce indentation.
Pull Request: https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/pulls/133967
