Embree's local intersection routine was not prepared
for local intersections without per-object BVH.
Now it should be able to handle any kind of local
intersection, such as AO, bevel and SSS.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D6602
This never really worked as it was supposed to. The main goal of this is to
turn noise from sampling tiny hairs into multiple layers of transparency that
do not need to be sampled stochastically. However the implementation of this
worked by randomly discarding hair intersections in BVH traversal, which
defeats the purpose.
If it ever comes back, it's best implemented outside the kernel as a preprocess
that changes hair radius before BVH building. This would also make it work with
Embree, where it's not supported now. But it's not so clear anymore that with
many AA samples and GPU rendering this feature is as helpful as it once was for
CPU raytracers with few AA samples.
The benefit of removing this feature is improved hair ray tracing performance,
tested on NVIDIA Titan Xp:
bmw27: +0.37%
classroom: +0.26%
fishy_cat: -7.36%
koro: -12.98%
pabellon: -0.12%
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D4532
Was happening when looking for all intersections for transparent shadow rays
in the case the ray is degenerate.
Still quesitonable whether we should consider this a transparent or opaque
configuraiton. Ideally, we should prevent such rays from happening, but that
is another vector of debugging.
BF-admins agree to remove header information that isn't useful,
to reduce noise.
- BEGIN/END license blocks
Developers should add non license comments as separate comment blocks.
No need for separator text.
- Contributors
This is often invalid, outdated or misleading
especially when splitting files.
It's more useful to git-blame to find out who has developed the code.
See P901 for script to perform these edits.
This commit adds a sample-based profiler that runs during CPU rendering and collects statistics on time spent in different parts of the kernel (ray intersection, shader evaluation etc.) as well as time spent per material and object.
The results are currently not exposed in the user interface or per Python yet, to see the stats on the console pass the "--cycles-print-stats" argument to Cycles (e.g. "./blender -- --cycles-print-stats").
Unfortunately, there is no clear way to extend this functionality to CUDA or OpenCL, so it is CPU-only for now.
Reviewers: brecht, sergey, swerner
Reviewed By: brecht, swerner
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D3892
While we shouldn't have logic in an entry point, and since one should
not be making typos when moving lines around, there is bigger entanglement
issue with BVH host code using kernel function. This is bad violation,
but is tricky to get solved moments before the weekly.
In order to keep things in a (less) broken state than before own cleanup
reverting the changes.
This reverts commit 2bad10be96.
This reverts commit ddabb21d05
Note that this is turned off by default and must be enabled at build time with the CMake WITH_CYCLES_EMBREE flag.
Embree must be built as a static library with ray masking turned on, the `make deps` scripts have been updated accordingly.
There, Embree is off by default too and must be enabled with the WITH_EMBREE flag.
Using Embree allows for much faster rendering of deformation motion blur while reducing the memory footprint.
TODO: GPU implementation, deduplication of data, leveraging more of Embrees features (e.g. tessellation cache).
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D3682
The crash was caused by BVH traversal stack being overflowed.
That overflow was caused by lots of false-positive intersections
for rays originating on a non-finite location.
Not sure why those rays will be existing in the first place,
this is to be investigated separately.
This commit moves pre-SSE4.1 check to a higher level function
and enables it for all miroarchitectures.
This is an initial implementation of BVH8 optimization structure
and packated triangle intersection. The aim is to get faster ray
to scene intersection checks.
Scene BVH4 BVH8
barbershop_interior 10:24.94 10:10.74
bmw27 02:41.25 02:38.83
classroom 08:16.49 07:56.15
fishy_cat 04:24.56 04:17.29
koro 06:03.06 06:01.45
pavillon_barcelona 09:21.26 09:02.98
victor 23:39.65 22:53.71
As memory goes, peak usage raises by about 4.7% in a complex
scenes.
Note that BVH8 is disabled when using OSL, this is because OSL
kernel does not get per-microarchitecture optimizations and
hence always considers BVH3 is used.
Original BVH8 patch from Anton Gavrikov.
Batched triangles intersection from Victoria Zhislina.
Extra work and tests and fixes from Maxym Dmytrychenko.
This means the shader can now be used for procedural texturing. New
settings on the node are Samples, Inside, Local Only and Distance.
Original patch by Lukas with further changes by Brecht.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D3479
Not sure why exactly it is called a cleanup, the code was much more clear
and robust against possible missing return statements which are MANDATORY.
Missing return statement will:
- Cause two different BVH traversals to be run.
Not is happening currently, but if more BVH layouts are added, it will
become a problem.
- It is already causing assert() statements to fail, since functions are
no longer returning when they are supposed to.
If there is any measurable reason to keep this change, let me know.
Otherwise just stick to reliable/tested/robust code.
This reverts commit ba65f7093b.
This save a little memory and copying in the kernel by storing only a 4x3
matrix instead of a 4x4 matrix. We already did this in a few places, and
those don't need to be special exceptions anymore now.
This was we can introduce other types of BVH, for example, wider ones, without
causing too much mess around boolean flags.
Thoughs:
- Ideally device info should probably return bitflag of what BVH types it
supports.
It is possible to implement based on simple logic in device/ and mesh.cpp,
rest of the changes will stay the same.
- Not happy with workarounds in util_debug and duplicated enum in kernel.
Maybe enbum should be stores in kernel, but then it's kind of weird to include
kernel types from utils. Soudns some cyclkic dependency.
Reviewers: brecht, maxim_d33
Reviewed By: brecht
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D3011
Empty BVH nodes are set to NaN which must be preserved all the way to the
tnear <= tfar test which can then give false for empty nodes. This needs
strict semantices and careful argument ordering for min() and max(), so
the second argument is used if either of the arguments is NaN.
Fixes T52635: crash in BVH traversal with SSE4.1.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2828
Fishy cat benchmark was rendering with wrong shadows. Cause is unclear,
adding printf or rearranging code seems to avoid this issue, possibly a
compiler bug. This reverts the fix and solves the OSL bug elsewhere.
We should only early out with any hit in BVH traversal if the only visibility
bits used are opaque shadow. Not when opaque shadow is one of multiple bits.
Since all the shadow catchers are already assumed to be in the footage,
the shadows they cast on each other are already in the footage too. So
don't just let shadow catchers skip self, but all shadow catchers.
Another justification is that it should not matter if the shadow catcher
is modeled as one object or multiple separate objects, the resulting
render should be the same.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2763
The idea is to make include statements more explicit and obvious where the
file is coming from, additionally reducing chance of wrong header being
picked up.
For example, it was not obvious whether bvh.h was refferring to builder
or traversal, whenter node.h is a generic graph node or a shader node
and cases like that.
Surely this might look obvious for the active developers, but after some
time of not touching the code it becomes less obvious where file is coming
from.
This was briefly mentioned in T50824 and seems @brecht is fine with such
explicitness, but need to agree with all active developers before committing
this.
Please note that this patch is lacking changes related on GPU/OpenCL
support. This will be solved if/when we all agree this is a good idea to move
forward.
Reviewers: brecht, lukasstockner97, maiself, nirved, dingto, juicyfruit, swerner
Reviewed By: lukasstockner97, maiself, nirved, dingto
Subscribers: brecht
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2586
