I can see how it's slowing things down: glFinish make sure that every query
are finished but the first query may have been finished a long time ago.
This might create bubbles because of the PIL_sleep_ms.
Unless there is an external action from an user, there should not
be need in re-copying original datablock to a copied one.
This brings performance up from 5fps to 11fps with Spring runcycle
(performance in master is 14fps).
Quite straightforward implementation, allows us to remove all the cherry-picking
update of specified scene/view layer/collection fields. Makes it possible to use
generic function to update scene.
The tricky part is that we need to know view layer pointer before the whole
evaluation starts. So we actually expand scene at initialization of evaluation.
context. This is still a bit of an exceptional case, but at least we still avoid
dangerous cherry-picking update.
For the performance we convert object bases list to an array
during view layer evaluation. This makes it possible to have
very cheap index-based base lookup.
The goal of this change is to get rid of base used for function
binding, and avoid scene datablock expansion at the depsgraph
construction time.
Use single function to evaluate all the collections for the given view layer.
This way we avoid need to get scene ID sub-data. Similar to pchan index, this
allows us to avoid build-time scene expansion, which also simplifies update of
the scene datablock.
Well, sort of. There is still work to be done to get rid of build-time scene
datablock expansion, which includes:
- Need to pass view layer by index.
Annoying part would be to get actual view layer for that index. In practice
doing list lookup might not be such a bad idea, since such lookup will not
happen very often, and it is unlikely to have more than handful of view
layer anyway.
Other idea could be to use view layer from evaluation context.
Or maybe from depsgraph, which is supposed to be in the context. Can have
some assert statements to make sure everything is good.
- Need to get id of base binding for flags flush.
We can replace that with index-based lookup from an array created by view
layer evaluation.
Reviewers: dfelinto
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D3141
Got lost in big undo refactor.
Note that this is probably (maybe) not how we want to have it in the
end, things like EditMode undo should probably not trigger this check?
The previous assert assumed '..' is always there, which isn't necessarily
true (for example when in the root of an Asset Engine repository).
The new code asserts that if '..' is present it should be the first entry
(rather than forcing the first entry to be '..').
the Vector Transform node was added to the "Vector" category in
nodeitems_builtins.py
but was using the "NODE_CLASS_CONVERTOR" internally (thus using e.g. the
'wrong' theme color)
thanx @dingto for review
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D3138
Only recreate ogl context if we cannot reuse the one of the previous thread.
Adding lots of shaders were recreating as many ogl context which was very
slow.
This happened when creating a window with the cursor over the timeline area.
I still don't know exactly what happened but for a reason batches were not
reset in this case.
This means fewer indices to store. That being said, it seems to be a little
slower because of the restart index. But that's in the case we would be
vertex bound, which is mostly never going to happen.
Fixes the "emtpy scrolling" glitch by clamping the scroller offset to
the boundary of the view when it's smaller than the previous.
Fixes T45197. Patch by @januz.
Differential Revision: D1580
The new constraint is slower and not backward compatible, but should
be better, especially in the damping side. The new constraint also
has a different valid range of the damping coefficient, and a limit
implementation that bounces instead of making the object stationary.
Reviewers: sergof
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D3125
WEBM is the codec name, and VP9 is the encoder (the older encoder "VP8"
is less efficient than VP9).
WEBM/VP9 and h.264 both have options to control the file size versus
compression time (e.g. fast but big, or slow and small, for the same
output quality). Since WEBM/VP9 only has three choices, I've chosen to
map those to 3 of the 9 possible choices of h.264:
- BEST → SLOWER
- GOOD → MEDIUM
- REALTIME → SUPERFAST
The VERYSLOW and ULTRAFAST options give very little extra benefit.
Reviewed by: @Severin
