This moves selectability/visibility flag flush from some hardcoded
places in the code to depsgraph. This way it is possible to simply
tag depsgraph to update those flags and rest it'll do on its own.
Using depsgraph for such flush is an overkill: those flags are fully
static and can not be animated, so it doesn't really make sense to
hook only those to depsgraph.
However, in the future we will have overrides on collections, which
ideally would need to be animatable and drivable and easiest way
to support this is to do this on depsgraph level, so it ensures
proper order of evaluation for animation and drivers. And it seems
logical to do both overrides and flags flush from depsgraph from
this point of view.
This commit also includes the evaluation of IDProperty for collections,
which basically are just another form of override. So once we implement
the other kind of overrides the flushing and collection evaluation won't
change.
Patch by Sergey Sharybin and Dalai Felinto
This should have been done earlier. But now that we may see more activity in master due to bcon3 merges, it is even more important to stress out the separation between master and 2.8.
Also I needed the version bump for idproperties doversion (they needed
to happen in _after_linking, and we don't have access to
DNA_struct_elem_find there).
Last but not least, every time I posted a video or image from 2.80, I
got someone confused about the version showing in the infobar.
First this replace a custom data struct with IDProperty, and use
IDProperty group merge and copying functions. Which means that a collection
property setting is only created if necessary.
This implements the "Layer Collection settings" override system, as
suggested in the "Override Manifesto" document.
The core is working, with Scene, LayerCollection and Object using a
single IDProperty to store all the render settings data. Next step is to
migrate this to depsgraph.
Note: Clay engine "ssao_samples" was hardcoded to 32 for now. It will come
back as part of "Workspace Settings" later.
Many thanks for Bastien Montagne for the help with the UI template
nightmare ;)
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2563
This adds the ability to switch between different application-configurations
without interfering with Blender's normal operation.
This commit doesn't include any templates,
so its mostly to allow collaboration for the Blender 101 project
and other custom configurations.
Application templates can be installed & selected from the file menu.
Other details:
- The `bl_app_template_utils` module handles template activation
(similar to `addon_utils`).
- The `bl_app_override` module is a general module
to assist scripts overriding parts of Blender in reversible way.
See docs:
https://docs.blender.org/manual/en/dev/advanced/app_templates.html
See patch: D2565
Ideally we need to find a way to remove such a static limit here, but it's not so
trivial to implement for texture nodes. Requires some bigger system redesign there.
Just raising limit for now, which is fine for modern systems.
This removes the goal springs, in favor of simply calculating the goal forces on the vertices directly. The vertices already store all the necessary data for the goal forces, thus the springs were redundant, and just defined both ends as being the same vertex.
The main advantage of removing the goal springs, is an increase in flexibility, allowing us to much more nicely do some neat dynamic stuff with the goals/pins, such as animated vertex weights. But this also has the advantage of simpler code, and a slightly reduced memory footprint.
This also removes the `f`, `dfdx` and `dfdv` fields from the `ClothSpring` struct, as that data is only used by the solver, and is re-computed on each step, and thus does not need to be stored throughout the simulation.
Reviewers: sergey
Reviewed By: sergey
Tags: #physics
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2514
Internal change needed for template support.
Loading the user preferences first so it's possible
for preferences to control startup behavior.
In general it's useful to load preferences before data-files,
so we know security settings for eg.
The thing i'm really starting to hate is the requirement to specify both
operation code and node type. Seems to be duplicated enums without real
need for that.
