Took me some time to figure out what was going on here... Was again that delayed button
callback stuff (`ui_apply_but_funcs_after()`), first calling button op, and then
its callback func.
Issue was that 'open file' op (through call to `WM_file_read()`) would clear
the splash screen (as more or less the entire 'dynamic' UI), but callback func of that splash
(`wm_block_splash_refreshmenu()`) would still try to access that freed menu's region.
So, root of the issue seems to be that setting context's wm/win/etc. would not clear
context's menu pointer (while clearing all other 'sub' pointers). I could not find
nor imagine any case where this behavior could be desired, so simply added nullification
of that pointer when setting context's wm/win/etc.
Note that crash was due to read-after-free, infuriating debug builds with asan,
but seems like release builds never actually crashed on it.
The issue was happening when having unconnected point density which
will cache data but will not free it because there's no actual call
to the actual sampling.
Now the idea is to make sure cache is zeroed on file load and undo
and then caching via RNA will free the data if any exists. This could
leave us with a single copy of cache in the node if it's not used,
but it's quite small amount of memory and it's not leaking.
Mainly it's related on a bad practice in SDL to force-define __SSE__
and __SSE2__ flags which generates quite some warnings and causes too
much noise.
There are some other warnings fixed. Should be no functional changes.
NeXyon, please check the changes in audaspace :)
Displaying a button would clamp the value if the button was outside the range.
This could be OK in some cases,
however it's problematic with object dimensions which would re-scale objects on showing the panel.
Add `ui_but_update_edited` when its OK to modify the value.
Without this, grabbing with normal weight will continually select new normals
based on where you move the cursor,
causing the normal location to flicker in a way which isn't controllable in any useful way.
Also re-reported through IRC by Thomas Beck (@plasmasolutions), thanks.
Though it's not ideal in theory, we have quite poor handling of object datablock currently
from user PoV - before this commit, it was not easily possible to get fully rid of an object
anymore if you did not removed it from all its groups before deleting it.
So for now, restore 2.76 behavior (namely, unlink an object from avaerything in Blender
once it is no more used by any scene).
Better handling of all this is TODO for later (also related to much more heavy changes
done in id-remap branch regarding sanitizing our ID deletion process).
Avoid allocating the (tiny) array on the heap in the first place.
Reviewers: sergey, lukastoenne
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D1815
Did a full compile of debug build with C++11 enabled, it all passed compilation
apart from some deprecated type used in GE's Video Texture. Solved it inside of
ifdef block now.
In the future we should uncomment the MSVC part of it, it should all be safe and
correct (MSVC2013 does not define new C++ version but supports C++11). The reason
it is commented is to have absolutely no effect on the upcoming release.
Behavior is similar to python's set.pop(), it removes and returns a 'random' entry from the hash.
Notes:
* Popping will return items in same order as ghash/gset iterators (i.e. increasing
order in internal buckets-based storage), unless ghash/gset is modified in between.
* We are keeping a track of the latest bucket we popped out (through a 'state' parameter),
this allows for similar performances to iterators when iteratively popping a whole hash
(without it, we are roughly O(n!), with it we are roughly O(n)...).
Reviewers: campbellbarton
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D1808
This is an attempt to improve the User preferences panel for the 3DView. I made 2 changes:
- I reordered the sequence of properties by grouping them into more logical groups as it made sense to me. Please indicate where to rearrange the order if necessary.
- Then i added some changes in the code to get the groups better arranged visually. I am pretty sure that this can be done much better, more clever, more generic, whatever. This is just what i could figure out on my own so far.
Reviewers: aligorith, sergey, gaiaclary
Subscribers: sergey
Projects: #user_interface
Maniphest Tasks: T47295
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D1757
