96f93ff42e
The last element of each 2048-element section was being skipped because the size of an `IndexRange` was being calculated like `range.last() - range.start()`, but it should have been like `range.one_after_last() - range.start()`. For example, the `IndexRange` starting at `0` with a size of `3` contains the values `0`, `1` and `2`, so `.start() == 0`, `.last() == 2` and `.one_after_last() == 3`. False positives could occur because the entirety of the `values` array was always being checked, even when only the first few elements were initialized. An end iterator matching the end of the initialized elements is now used instead of the end of the array itself. The `value` argument was ignored by some code paths, which instead always checked for `true`. This didn't cause any issues currently, because all uses of #contains are searching for `true`, but this may not be the case in the future. Pull Request: https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/pulls/116834
Blender
Blender is the free and open source 3D creation suite. It supports the entirety of the 3D pipeline-modeling, rigging, animation, simulation, rendering, compositing, motion tracking and video editing.
Project Pages
Development
License
Blender as a whole is licensed under the GNU General Public License, Version 3. Individual files may have a different, but compatible license.
See blender.org/about/license for details.