Since [0], transform gizmos are no longer hidden during transform.
The same can be observed for rotation gizmos.
However, as a workaround for these rotation gizmos, there was already a
drawing utility running.
With the gizmo and the utility this drawing is now being done twice.
So remove the utility/workaround and update the gizmo accordingly.
[0] {648350e456490f8d6258e7de9bf94d3a6a34dbb2}
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D9542
A new experimentatl STL importer, written in C++. Roughly 7-9x faster than the
Python based one.
Reviewed By: Aras Pranckevicius, Hans Goudey.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D14941
A field input node for the scale of each top-level instance transform.
The scale can be set with the "Scale Instances" node, but previously
could not be retrieved.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D15132
A field input node for the rotation of each top-level instance transform.
The rotation can be set with the "Rotate Instances" node, but previously
could not be retrieved.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D15131
The original assert did not take into account the offset size in the loop being -1. The tests were then run in non-debug mode, so while the mesh regressions still passed, the false positive asserts that happened were not caught.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D15136
The transformation snapping code contains a bunch of `#define`s, some ambiguously or incorrectly named attributes. This patch contains refactored code to improve this. This patch does (should) not change functionality of snapping.
Clarified ambiguously / incorrectly named attributes.
- "Target" is used to refer to the part of the source that is to be snapped (Active, Median, Center, Closest), but several other areas of Blender use the term "target" to refer to the thing being snapped to and "source" to refer to the thing getting snapped. Moreover, the implications of the previous terms do not match the descriptions. For example: `SCE_SNAP_TARGET_CENTER` does not snap the grabbed geometry to the center of the target, but instead "Snap transforamtion center onto target".
- "Select" refers to the condition for an object to be a possible target for snapping.
- `SCE_SNAP_MODE_FACE` is renamed to `SCE_SNAP_MODE_FACE_RAYCAST` to better describe its affect and to make way for other face snapping methods (ex: nearest).
Refactored related `#define` into `enum`s. In particular, constants relating to...
- `ToolSettings.snap_flag` are now in `enum eSnapFlag`
- `ToolSettings.snap_mode` are now in `enum eSnapMode`
- `ToolSettings.snap_source` (was `snap_target`) are now in `enum eSnapSourceSelect`
- `ToolSettings.snap_flag` (`SCE_SNAP_NO_SELF`) and `TransSnap.target_select` are now in `enum eSnapTargetSelect`
As the terms became more consistent and the constants were packed together into meaningful enumerations, some of the attribute names seemed ambiguous. For example, it is unclear whether `SnapObjectParams.snap_select` referred to the target or the source. This patch also adds a small amount of clarity.
This patch also swaps out generic types (ex: `char`, `short`, `ushort`) and unclear hard coded numbers (ex: `0`) used with snap-related enumerations with the actual `enum`s and values.
Note: I did leave myself some comments to follow-up with further refactoring. Specifically, using "target" and "source" consistently will mean the Python API will need to change (ex: `ToolSettings.snap_target` is not `ToolSettings.snap_source`). If the API is going to change, it would be good to make sure that the used terms are descriptive enough. For example, `bpy.ops.transform.translate` uses a `snap` argument to determine if snapping should be enabled while transforming. Perhaps `use_snap` might be an improvement that's more consistent with other conventions.
This patch is (mostly) a subset of D14591, as suggested by @mano-wii.
Task T69342 proposes to separate the `Absolute Grid Snap` option out from `Increment` snapping method into its own method. Also, there might be reason to create additional snapping methods or options. (Indeed, D14591 heads in this direction). This patch can work along with these suggestions, as this patch is trying to clarify the snapping code and to prompt more work in this area.
Reviewed By: mano-wii
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D15037
Scaling handles while dragging could be distracting, especially at
extreme values where handles could become large on-screen.
Now all gizmos are shown while scaling.
GIZMO_GT_arrow_3d now now support changing their length while being
dragged as well as negative lengths.
The separate geometry and delete geometry nodes often invert the
selection so that deleting elements from a geometry can be implemented
as copying the opposite selection of elements. This should make the two
nodes faster in some cases, since the generic versions of selection
creation functions (i.e. from d3a1e9cbb9) are used instead
of the single threaded code that was used for this node.
The change also makes the deletion/separation code easier to
understand because it doesn't have to pass around the inversion.
When interacting with translate/rotate/scale gizmo, show the gizmo while
it's in use. There are some exceptions to this, as showing all scale
gizmos while scaling causes the gizmos to become large & distracting so
in this case only the gizmo being dragged is shown.
Resolves T63743.
Some operators OR'ed the existing flags in a way that made it seem
the value might already have some values set.
Replace this with assignment as no flags are set and the convention
with almost all operators is to write the value directly.
This implements the new way to attach curves to a mesh surface using
a uv map (based on the recent discussion in T95776).
The curves data block now not only stores a reference to the surface object
but also a name of a uv map on that object. Having a uv map is optional
for most operations, but it will be required later for animation (when the
curves are supposed to be deformed based on deformation of the surface).
The "Empty Hair" operator in the Add menu sets the uv map name automatically
if possible. It's possible to start working without a uv map and to attach the
curves to a uv map later on. It's also possible to reattach the curves to a new
uv map using the "Curves > Snap to Nearest Surface" operator in curves sculpt
mode.
Note, the implementation to do the reverse lookup from uv to a position on the
surface is trivial and inefficient now. A more efficient data structure will be
implemented separately soon.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D15125
After this commit, all mesh data extraction and drawing code is in C++,
including headers, making it possible to use improved types for future
performance improvements and simplifications.
The only non-trivial changes are in `draw_cache_impl_mesh.cc`,
where use of certain features and macros in C necessitated larger
changes.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D15088
This implements transform modes for the transform tool and Elastic
Transform. This mode uses the Kelvinlets from elastic deform to apply
the transformation to the mesh, using the cursor radius to control the
elasticity falloff.
{F9269771}
In order for this to work, the transform tool uses incremental mode when
elastic transform is enabled. This allows to integrate the displacement of
the Kelvinet in multiple steps.
Review By: Sergey Sharbin & Daniel Bystedt & Julian Kaspar & Campbell
Barton
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D9653
Ref D15041
The code that checked whether vertex normals needed to be recalculated
was checking the dirty tag for face normals and vertex normals, in an
attempt at increased safety. However, those tags are always set
together anyway. Only checking the vertex dirty tag allows potentially
allocating or updating the normals on the two domains independently,
which could allow further skipping of calculations in some cases.
The fix is to unify with the name we had for the old Curves objects.
That means that we will see them bothi (old and new curves) in the outliner
(under two different categories but with different names).
This is considered to be a temporary solution until we remove the old
curve system entirely.
This was leading to some crashes and warnings such as:
"Code marked as unreachable has been executed. Please report this as a bug."
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D15116
Code handling repetitive boolean operations when using several objects
from a Collection would not handle result mesh properly, re-creating for
each object without properly freeing it.
Further more, existing code was effectively converting the BMesh to mesh
twice, including a modification of the initial (input) mesh, which
modifiers should never do!
Removed the extra useless conversion, which also gives a small
improvement in performances:
With as simple of a scene as four objects (three operands in a
collection, and the modified one) totalling 20k vertices/faces, this
commit:
* Avoids 2MB memory leak per evaluation (!).
* Speeds up boolean evaluation by 5-10%.
Found while investigating some production files of the Project Heist
here at the Blender Studio.
In the latest discussions about curves/hair mesh attachement
information (T95776), it was decided to use UV coordinates to
store where on the mesh each root is. For that, we have to specify
which of the UV map attributes to use for UV lookups.
This property isn't used yet, but it will be shortly when refactoring
the attachement information in the add brush and the to particle
system conversion.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D15115
Instead of directly accessing constraint-specific callbacks
in code all over blender, introduce two wrappers to retrieve
and free the target list.
This incidentally revealed a place within the Collada exporter
in BCAnimationSampler.cpp that didn't clean up after retrieving
the targets, resulting in a small memory leak. Fixing this should
be the only functional change in this commit.
This was split off from D9732.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D13844
The packed image loader was not aware of the fact that UDIM tiles
can be of a different size.
Exposed Python API required to access this information. It has the
same complexity as the "regular" packed files: in both cases the
ImBuf will be acquired and released to access the information.
While the current workflow of packing UDIMs is not very streamlined,
it is still possible and is something what the studio is using here.
Test file:
{F13130516}
Expected behavior achieved with this patch: a bigger checker board
pattern in viewport render
Actual behavior prior to this patch: either memory corruption, or
wrong/black render result on the plane
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D15111
