The GLSL processor appears to dislike a member named "select" when a function named "select" exists.
The member has been renamed to object_select to avoid collisions.
Pull Request: https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/pulls/138466
This avoid having to guards functions that are
only available in fragment shader stage.
Calling the function inside another stage is still
invalid and will yield a compile error on Metal.
The vulkan and opengl glsl patch need to be modified
per stage to allow the fragment specific function
to be defined.
This is not yet widely used, but a good example is
the change in `film_display_depth_amend`.
Rel #137261
Pull Request: https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/pulls/138280
This makes no sense to have in the draw namespace.
Also take the opportunity for making the coordinates
a float2 and rename them to something more descriptive.
Do this only when applicable.
This allow better compile time checking in Shader C++ compilation.
Moreover, this allows to have `constexpr` in shared code between
C++ and GLSL.
After investigation the `const` keyword in GLSL has the same
semantic than C/C++.
Rel #137333 and #137446
Pull Request: https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/pulls/137497
This unify the C++ and GLSL codebase style.
The GLSL types are still in the backend compatibility
layers to support python shaders. However, the C++
shader compilation layer doesn't have them to enforce
correct type usage.
Note that this is going to break pretty much all PRs
in flight that targets shader code.
Rel #137261
Pull Request: https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/pulls/137369
They are actually already some literals with the `f` suffix
that are in our shader codebase and we never had problem in
the past 5 years (or even 8 years).
So I think it is safe to do and improves convergence of codestyles.
Pull Request: https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/pulls/137352
**Problem**
When using Texture Paint mode, the Image Editor will show a UV Wireframe
to display the active object's UVs. In every other mode, this wireframe
is absent. This is currently a big problem for Sculpt Mode since the
Experimental Texture Paint system is a part of that mode, meaning that
the user can't see their UVs while they paint in Sculpt Mode. This is
also troublesome for users that would like to quickly view an object's
UVs without using Texture Paint Mode.
**Solution**
Since it's useful to be able to view an object's UVs at all times, the
Image Editor should display UV Wireframes in all Object Modes regardless
of the Image Editor's mode. This is the best solution since it means
that future Blender features, that would benefit from having a preview
of an object's UV Wireframes, will automatically have that option since
UV Wireframes are supported in all modes. Also, if a user doesn't want
to see UV Wireframes for any reason, it can be disabled with an Overlay
option.
Additionally, when multiple objects are selected, each object should
have its UV Wireframe drawn in the Image Editor. The selected objects
that aren't active should have less opaque wireframes to indicate which
wireframe belongs to the active object. This is the best approach for
having multiple objects selected since it allows the user to quickly
view the UV layout for all selected objects to troubleshoot UV problems,
like texture mapping. This is especially helpful when using a material
for multiple different objects.
An alternative solution would be to only show the UV Wireframe for the
active object, but this would be undesirable because it would make
troubleshooting UV positions tedious when working with multiple objects
since the user would need to select objects individually.
Co-authored-by: T0MIS0N <50230774+T0MIS0N@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Sean Kim <SeanCTKim@protonmail.com>
Pull Request: https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/pulls/135102
Resolves several int -> uint conversion warnings. Warnings like the
following will be printed otherwise:
```
|
225 | uint shadow_type = flags & 0xF;
| ^
| gpu_shader_text_vert.glsl:17:22: Warning: some implementations
may not support implicit int -> uint conversions for `&'
operators; consider casting explicitly for portability
```
Pull Request: https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/pulls/135890
This was caused by the normals not being available (default to
`vec3(0)`) which produced `NaN`s down the line after the
unsafe normalize. Changing to `safe_normalize` fixes the issue.
